

is this our timeline’s version of “there are no atheists in foxholes”?
is this our timeline’s version of “there are no atheists in foxholes”?
what? and ban all flights to australia?
fucking humans!
no, concrete wall.
if niger is 25m and nigeria is 230m, then it follows that the “ia” suffix is 205m by itself.
so you’re saying that there’s a possibility that some of those email messages i receive from nigerian widows looking for a partner to launder money out of the country are real?
the employee, from Walker, Michigan, allegedly stabbed the company president in the side during a staff meeting.
see, he should have known that, in meetings, it’s bullet points that are more acceptable.
so, the czech’s in the mail?
and how much would they have saved if they had gone for no employees at all but onlyfans?
the usa and sentences with “monarch” and “threatening”; name a more iconic duo.
i like the idea of using indeciperable as a euphemism to replace expletives. this should be generally adopted imo.
“i have the worst indecipherable luck!”
if you don’t like the reflection, don’t blame the mirror.
was she, by any chance, a habitual offender?
you do know how to use the oxford comma, i’ll grant you that.
yeah, but it can do really cool things like “suggest a name for my project that does X”.
surely that game’s worth the candle, yes?
yeah but it’s australia. their under 16 is our under 91.
deleted by creator
while you may be right, one would think that the problem lies in the overestimated peception of the abilities of llms leading to misplaced investor confidence – which in turn leads to a bubble ready to burst.
… bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…
one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.
… while they get super rich off it.
because they’re only focusing on this.
because people can’t misuse laws for pet euthanasia in order to get an early inheritance, or to get their toe in before a will changes.
in many scenarios, euthanasia does make sense but there is ample opportunity for greedy people to misuse such laws. it would be hazardous to enact such a law unless adequate protection is provided.