

Does this induce a current?
I try to contribute to things getting better, with sourced information, OC and polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with a point ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.
Does this induce a current?
Do you avoid every kind of nature swimming? What if the tests say that it is as clean as the river or sea you trusted to swim before?
I think it’s mediagenic enough that journalists and other organizations probably tried to do their own tests and found nothing suspicious that wasn’t officially announced.
By the Olympic Games 2024, the work to improve the infrastructure to prevent pollution already costed 1.4 billions of euros. I guess additional infrastructure for exceptional meteorological events was just too much to be justified.
If the water is tested every day of the opened swimming season, there’s no reason to worry.
It’s controlled every day and closed if there’s any danger, for example after heavy rains bringing more pollution than usual. They have started finding different forms of life that only happen in very clean waters, it’s pretty cool. One of the few positive ecological news lately.
Depending on the country no ID number may be necessary. Not required for France.
It is still getting hugged, I guess people are rushing to add their names now that it is a won battle.
Edit: managed to load at 999,614.
From a scientific point of view this is correct, the climate system is too complex to say this particular event is due to climate change. Exceptional events happened in the past too. So you can only draw conclusions from larger statistics. What’s solid science is the increasing averages, increasing frequencies of extreme events etc. If it was scientifically informed, that’s what this kind of sentence mean.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Persson#Social_media_comments