Wasn’t it about ranking female students by attractiveness or something?

Norwegians aren’t more environmentally-minded than people elsewhere, she reckons. “I don’t think a green mindset has much to do with it. It has to do with strong policies, and people gradually understanding that driving an electric car is possible.”

Yet Norway is also a very wealthy nation, which thanks to its huge oil and gas exports, has a sovereign wealth fund worth more than $1.7tn (£1.3tn). This means it can more easily afford big infrastructure-build projects, and absorb the loss of tax revenue from the sale of petrol and diesel cars and their fuel.

The country also has an abundance of renewable hydro electricity, which accounts for 88% of its production capacity.

It’s some high judge so I think they are independent from the government but I don’t know their system well.

Nice

Maybe some specific frontend or mobile app.

Brazil has at least some history of fighting against tech giant’s disrespect of regularions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazil

Short rolling demo from the article https://youtube.com/watch?v=ibpaLkvBXQY

To be honest, I had a bad experience a few years ago when I wanted to try contributing, and I never tried again. Yet, I think it’s really hard to strike a balance of freedom and constrains for organically curated Q&A, so I try not to be too fast on judging them considering the service that they indubitably provided to millions of people.

I’ve read it is still well valued because people will keep asking questions there when LLM can’t answer, so they remain a precious source of post LLM curated Q&A.

Except for people selling nuclear shelters.

If people think the price are going down they will wait more before buying anything not essential and a lot of our economy is not essential. Deflation is not only going to touch what you buy, it’s also going to touch what you or your company sells, reducing revenues.

Definitely agree on the ecological advantage, but the current economical system that provides most of the jobs of people here would deflate, people would lose jobs. Less human activity will always be better for ecology, but there’s probably some activity we want to keep to make our lifes good.

Unfair redistribution is an issue, but it’s a bit orthogonal from deflation issues. I think people expect to get opportunities, promotions, new jobs, raising salary etc. this works better with a little inflation.

Usually when a company has less work over a prolonged period, it’s not just going to reduce worked hours, it’s going to reduce the number of workers.

Until your company, your salary and your job start deflating too.

I think the usual issue with deflation that people will wait for prices to keep going down and therefore keep buying less which feeds the deflation.

You are very quick to deduct things. The reason land is dedicated to it is that it is not easy to organize with building owners to get it on the roof, compared to buying land building what you want on it, and equipping roofs is obviously more technical than building on the ground. We can’t just think it terms on what could be possible but what the reality is.
Countries who try to stop land artificialization to reduce impact on biodiversity struggle to, because of all the economical pressure where renewables may contribute, it’s not an easy subject.
Please try not to look for negative intentions, I am here to participate in the debate and learn with others.

Why do you have to reduce a discussion to chilling? What a sad attitude.
I guess you’re not in a listening mood, but in case you are, let me state my opinion: I am in favor of all solutions that will help reduce the ecological crisis, which means reducing dependency of fossil fuels, raw materials extraction, and land usage among other things. I think both nuclear and renewables are good solutions for that, but they both have issues, so let’s use what is most appropriate for every use case.

I am not making any excuse, I’m providing additional points to consider.