• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • it’s a very interesting distribution. it feels and probably is slightly faster than arch, with their optimised packages (I had v3), but to be honest you have to rely on their prebuilt binaries and I prefer flatpaks.

    I used it for ~ 3 months, but eventually went back to arch and flatpaks (using flatpaks on cache defeats the purpose of having v3/v4 packages, until someone starts bundling optimised dependencies ).

    I prefer the originals always, but it is a viable alternative if you enjoy a friendly installer (their Anaconda is very nice).








  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyztoLinux@lemmy.mlSystemd v257 released
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of systemd/Linux!

    but are they really? how about distros without systemd what would you call those OpenRC/Linux? systemd is indeed a giant intricate project,which is why some people don’t like it or are against it,but all its components are working alongside the Linux kernel, without which there wouldn’t be a need for systemd. I would say it’s rather Linux with systemd,as systemd is optional.

    edit: useless autocorrect










  • I genuinely didn’t know about this. I’ve been avoiding immutable OSes as I’ve had issues with distros like Bazzite in the past where packages completely disappeared from my system after a freeze when overclocking my GPU,which ruined the whole experience for me.

    However, I’m interested in blend os,which unfortunately comes with gnome by default,but I will give it another try with layering plasma on it next time I try it,cause the idea of a distrobox centric distro is really appealing.

    End rant.

    Thanks for sharing this.