There’s a logical fallacy in here somewhere. I don’t think he’s wrong, AAA is much more risk adverse and we haven’t been seeing as many innovative high budget hits IMO but rather call of duty… 12? Madden 24, NBA and fortnight whatever in the top games section.
I think there’s room for both to exist, it’s okay to have sequels but would be nice to also let people be creative with a budget.
Not practically, though, otherwise the post wouldn’t make sense.
I feel like it’s probably better to have more competition in the space, but Spirit and Frontier are godawful.
“Why don’t you want to have kids?” 🙄
I’m not sure in what context you mean, here. Are you saying that there are just less democrats than republicans or are you just talking shit?
Ah yes, the usual blaming of minorities for all the democrats that didn’t show up.
Lol tell me you don’t know about making games without saying you don’t know about making games.
Just write in “yo momma”
For fun.
I see OP in their comment history uses “tyres” so they’re probably not from the US.
C-Walking has been a prominent fad in the US, more so in the early 2000s than recently, but most people are familiar with it.
I don’t understand the context of this post, but there’s not much here of note if you grew up in the US and made it past late teenager.
At this point, Snoop is inevitable.
This is one weird way to advertise a swinger’s party.
That’s what I’m trying to say. I don’t think such a game is feasible.
Also, in the context of this threat, saying “ooo Tetris isn’t political!” is being pedantic, that’s not what the person meant when they asked for an example of a non political game.
I’m not saying I know anything about this Dragon Age, I haven’t played it.
I think it’s a fair point though, to imagine an a-political narrative game, because I think most if not all RPG games I can think of have some kind of political content.
Now make it so you have to beat e1m1 for the alarm to turn off.
It’s bullshit all the way down.
Lol uh I mean I don’t think the author* is giving the generally normal people just working their job enough credit. In my anecdotal experience, the growth mindset stuff is just an excuse to say certain things at meetings, or make certain decisions, nobody is extremely bought in or anything.
In fact, I knew some folks that left Microsoft because of the growth mindset changes for more “old school” places like Boeing.
Generally speaking I think all these companies have some kind of cultish exterior, I can say this about Google, Apple, Amazon and Facebook for sure. If you’re ever let inside the walls though, it’s mostly regular people trying to live their lives.
Took them a while to label the hot tub titty streams, from what I remember.
You’re right, because a lot of it was “game not horny” and I don’t have time for incel garbage
This dude used to point out legit game quality issues, but I’m not sold on “the game isn’t horny anymore”. I dont really give a shit about that.
That and the RE4 remaster was genuinely good. Starting to feel like an edge lord.
What really irks me are people that think there’s such a thing as a “good” billionaire. Had an argument one time because I said all billionaires are inherently shitty, and my colleague was trying to convince me that Bill Gates is actually a good person.
Get real son, the path to billionaire is paved with blood.
I think a lot of the MK1 experience is good and well done. I think there’s a lot of style and gameplay that make it fun and mostly worth the cost of entry. The cameo system included, although poorly balanced, added another dimension to the gameplay.
Where they lose me is the DLC. They asked a lot for the expansion and didn’t offer much. On top of that many of the added characters should’ve been there, or needed rebalancing after release.
I’m still not convinced you should take an NRS fighter seriously, but I’m usually willing to see what they’ll put out.