If by ‘legal definition’ you mean the definition used in the recent letter signed in parlament: That’s not legally binding. It’s basically just a statement with no legal status. But yes it could signal the path the new government might take in the future.

Given the murky definition of antisemitism which was recently adopted in a letter from parlament, this could lead to some very interesting but uncomfortable situations for the government. Such as revoking citizenship from Jews or Israelis critical of Israels current government.

That is not the correct scene for this quote, isn’t it?

That’s Vader in the camber where Han is frozen and the exchange with Lando happens in front of a lift, doesn’t it?

IIRC that’s Cloudflares random number generator.

Rookie numbers. The Bundes­amt für Bevölkerungs­schutz und Katastrophen­hilfe recommends to have supplies for two weeks on hand.

In totally unrelated news: Two weeks is also the projected timeframe it would take for a civil war like state to emerge if order can’t be established after a country wide emergency.

It’s interesting to see this comment thread getting downvotes considering that apparently in Paris 300,000 Condoms were handed out to athletes.

OK, my time to pick nits: There is a clear and present threat. China, Russia and certainly the US as well have teams of cryptographers looking at software such as Signal and analysing every update and change made in order to spot potential openings. The threat towards Signal however is comparatively small because there are tens if not hundreds of times as many people checking the code as well and reporting back to Signal because of its Open-source nature.

If I rob a bank and give it to my kids, it is suddenly OK to keep the money?

Solving the root cause of issues? Na, it’s easier to blame the migrants. Just keep doing business as usual.

Brought to you by CDU, CSU & SPD

A German tourist

Sorry for not sending out best. I hope the guys wore socks in sandals at least to properly represent our national outfit.

1. It can be viewed as part of your privacy to not be subject to defamation.
2. If it reaches the threshold of defamation it is punishable. Whether its enforcement is feasible is another matter.

I think given the current state of the Russian military, implementing Red Storm Rising is off the table.

Trump also undermined Denmark’s claim to Greenland, saying it was “very far away and really has nothing to do” with the island.

Well, except, you know … the whole Nordic/Viking settlements thing?

It is somewhat bewildering to realize that we have come all this way in technology but somewhere something is always turning water into steam to drive a piston of some sort.

Nope, all they collect is date of registration and last time the client connected to the server. Has been proven in court.

I am not 100 % sure I understand your point here. Using paper ballots doesn’t mean you have to submit your vote via mail. You can still use local polling stations.

I assume you are from the US, so here is what we do in Germany:

• You are notified via mail of the upcoming election you are eligible to take part in (No special registration required, only the usual registry with the municipality if you move to a new place)
• Option A: You opt in for a (paper) mail ballot
  • You receive a ballot via mail that you fill out and then double wrap the ballot: The ballot goes into an official unmarked envelope that is later placed with every other mail-in ballot of the district. The unmarked enveloped goes into a regular envelope for transportation via mail (which is free of charge)
• Option B: On the day of the election, you head to your assigned local polling station
  • You identify yourself by one of the official forms (Personal ID, driving licence, passport)
  • You are handed a blank paper ballot ([example from northern Germany](file:///home/se/Downloads/Muster-Stimmzettel_zur_Bundestagswahl_2025_im_Wahlkreis_1.PDF))
  • You make your choice behind a privacy screen
    • Law declares that the head of the local election council has to be able to view both the booth and the voter (but of course not the vote) except in some special circumstances.
  • The ballot is then placed in a sealed urn
  • After the deadline at 18:00 the urn is unsealed and votes are counted
    • Critically: This counting is public. While not many people do, it is explicitly allowed to watch the officials at this stage
  • After tallying the votes, the ballots are bundled up, sealed and handed to the officials on the municipality level.

One of the many issues with electronic voting are those last two steps: Examining the votes can never be public, as we are simply unable to look at the state of all electrons in a computer.

+1 for paper ballots (relevant xkcd )

-9999 for banning voting booths

I’m eagerly waiting for his upcoming book about this terrible disease.

I’m afraid you’ll have to wait a bit longer as John probably has to add a few more chapters due to current events …

US simultaneously wants the world to depend on them while also treating them like second class Allies.

That’s a core principle of colonialism: The colony acts as a cheap resource provider and sales market for the colonizer at the same time while having no actual autonomy.

We also can see a similar dynamic in modern globalism where production facilities were moved to countries where labour is cheap. Which is the reason many people call globalism colonialism 2.0.