Things can be about multiple things.

What world are you living in that “PC exclusives” are a thing, let alone a problem?

And it’s all thanks to you, shithead!

It’s an ironic line to start with.

The quote in the the title implies its response was accusatory rather than just revealing.

Grok can’t “reveal” shit because it doesn’t know shit. It puts words together, that’s it. It doesn’t have a brain, let alone a memory of what anyone has changed in it.

“America’s allies still don’t realize they’re not allies anymore.”

They can be, but they’re not.

Not liking racist ≠ " I love [insert corporation here]". More than one bad thing can exist in the world simultaneously.

It’s called negging. They think if you insult someone’s effort for you, they’ll just try to please you more. And they’re so fucked in the head, they fall for it themselves.

The technical term was created to promote the misunderstanding that LLMs “think”. The “experts” want people to think LLMs are far more advanced than they actually are. You can add as many tokens to your context as you want - every model is still, fundamentally, a text generator. Humanizing it more than that is naive or deceptive, depending on how much money you have riding on the bubble.

Leapfrogged? It never left. LLMs were made to make shit up.

Except it’s not libel. It’s a one time string of text generated exclusively for him. Literally no one would have known what it said if the guy didn’t get the exact thing he wants “deleted” published online for everyone to see. Now it’ll be linked to his name forever, but the llm didn’t do that.

A reason to return them, sure, but that’s not what the comment says.

That’s a byproduct of them living in proximity, not a reason for it.

Name names. I want the lowdown on underappreciated ice cream.

and has repeatedly warned personnel not to defy its efforts to “silence the social mission.”

I can’t imagine ever saying anything like that. I often think bad people think they’re the good guys in their own eyes but…damn…that’s just plain evil.

I haven’t delved too deep into the shitshow that followed that game, and I know it’s convoluted as hell, but it seems like that’s referring to previous associates of the studio, not the studio itself. The page mentions Martin Luiga in association with it, for whatever that’s worth.

I can sympathize with that. The whole game is intentionally bleak and rough, which can be pretty off putting (though it does make the few nice parts exceptionally nice). The devs made a pretty overt choice to focus more on being fairly confrontational art rather than being particularly accommodating to the player.

That’s not an inaccurate description. Though context is important - most of the characters know yours through behavior and actions that neither you or the character remember. A lot of the game is playing with how you handle that.