

This makes no sense. Changing the number on the clocks isn’t what makes you change your sleep/wake cycle AT ALL. It’s changing when the working day starts that does that.
This makes no sense. Changing the number on the clocks isn’t what makes you change your sleep/wake cycle AT ALL. It’s changing when the working day starts that does that.
Yeah, that is silly. If you’re going to be that radical, you may as well go decimal at the same time. 10 hours, 100 minutes, 100 seconds. Ignore when the sun rises. Have 400 days in a year, ignore when the seasons come. I bet you my best docker container people hate and ignore the broken system that bears no relationship to their reality.
Every wankpanzer ever? I had to check it wasn’t the onion. It’s not the onion.
And Russia already stopped bombing Ukrainian power plants because the only ones left are nuclear and even Putin is hesitant about causing Chernobyl 2.0. So the ceasefire wouldn’t affect Russian activities in any way whatsoever.
So this is some seriously weak negotiating from Diaper Don.
You’re correct, this course of action wouldn’t harm Elon Musk at all.
But I think you’re mistaking the user you’re talking to for something other than a right wing troll trying to sound like they care about poor people.
They work by giving all the money to Elon Musk, who needs it less than anyone on the planet except Jeff Besos.
I don’t think that’s how most car showrooms work, let alone Tesla showrooms.
Probably hadn’t paid the monthly subscription for the emergency door non-locking software.
I don’t think it’s road legal in the EU. something about not passing safety tests.
Starving the children to fund tax cuts for billionaires.
Starving the kids to own the libs
x IS a massive cyber attack these days.
Critical questions include who would handle federal funding for low-income schools, disability programs, and civil rights enforcement.
Why would you think that president Musk or vice president Trump want any of those things to continue to be funded?
I liked tcsh. It was my favourite shell.
Still mathematically incorrect, I’m afraid.
Your point isn’t valid because “people who voted” is certainly not a random sample but it is also not an unbiased or stratified sample of the population.
It’s very plausible indeed that (for example) democratic leaning voters were jaded and stayed home whilst republicans were excited about the disruptive influence their guy mightt have.
Your sample contains no eligible voters whatsoever in the stayed-home category and it’s heinous extrapolation to assume that your proportion extends into this group with markedly different behaviour to those in your sample, especially when the percentages were so close in any case.
Using your logic, I could do a hypothesis test with a tiny sample of hundred voters and get my margin of error under a SL of 5% and claim statistical significance, because if I excluded people who voted in person or people who voted by postal vote, I would get strikingly different outcomes. Thus, if voter preference is correlated so markedly even by method of voting, it’s absurd to suggest that there’s no correlation over fact of voting.
By your logic (statistical significance irrespective of how non-random and non-stratified a sample is), no pre election poll could ever be wrong.
Statistical significance isn’t the same as truth. How representive and free from bias your sample is are two things that are critical to the validity of your conclusions.
Wrong, just wrong.
36% of eligible voters did not vote. That’s more people than voted for Trump.
Wow, when you straw man, you straw man hard.
It’s either footage from Epstein’s plane of sex acts with obvious minors, or it’s just that Putin tells him he’s a great leader and everyone knows he’s cleverer and better than Obama, Clinton and Biden. Trump is a complete sucker for absurd praise.
It’s exactly what… Russia would request.
No coincidence there. Trump really is that stupid and traitorous.
I score zero for reading comprehension!