There is evidence that when you make an llm explain why it did something that it’s less likely to just make things up, but like all it does it make things up in a verifiable way, in that case. It’s a plagiarism machine, not a thinking machine.
High King Margo the Destroyer, thank you very much
Yeah, uh, don’t got a console so it will not be.
He, umm, was actually a shit person beforehand too. Just had better optics on the national stage
… you linked the wiki under a post that jokingly stated that Einstein was confounded by the invention of the bomb. Without additional context, it seemed to me like you were implying he was blanket endorsing the creation of the bomb. So I put that info out there to clarify his stance without anyone needing to open an additional link.
I wasn’t being sassy or nothing, just adding context.
… Okay, a little bit sassy, but that’s just how I roll, no shade intended.
Yes, to beat the nazis to the invention. Cause there’s nothing worse than nazis with nukes
Yes, but have you considered the optics of saying we’re working 72 hour weeks on these issues?
Have you considered all the fraud Somali Somali fraud by Somalis committing fraud in Somali fraud communities fraud Somali fraud? /s
Kinda telling on yourself with this. Nothing about this looks like Will Smith
Rand sucks and had no concept of power dynamics. Fitting, since she groomed her students and forced her husband who was fully dependent on her into letting her cheat on him.
Yes, a person who looks like a man will get the cops called on them/assaulted if they attempt to enter the women’s restroom. They want to force trans people into bathrooms where they don’t conform so they no longer feel safe in public. It isn’t some gotcha, the cruelty is the point. They want trans people to go back into the closet or to leave their state.
Yes, they want trans people to feel like they can’t use the bathroom anywhere, correct
Just tax wealth at twice the rate of inflation above 500 million dollars.
No no. Other people pay politicians to have opinions, silly. They don’t fund political movements, they use them to gain leverage in elections. Duh /s
Might stop murdering your people*
Majority is over half or 50% + 1. And we have a very high level of purposeful disenfranchisement. Gerrymandering, restriction of voting places, removal of mail-in votes, no voting holiday, voter ID laws, purging of vote roles with no way to renew your registration in time, two parties that are ever marching rightward away from most American’s policy preferences.
Like, be mad at the people who voted for this, but it’s not even close to most of us. They’re unpopular, and most people don’t want this shit. There are more of us than there are of them so stop acting like you’ve already lost and that we deserve this. We didn’t and we don’t.
Trump didn’t receive a majority of the votes, and 64% of eligible voters voted. So, not even a third of voters voted for this.
The problem is that the consequences aren’t balanced. If you disobey an order, the consequences are immediate. If you obey an illegal order, you might face consequences at some point in the future. If you disobey an order because you genuinely believe it’s illegal, there’s no protection for you if that happens to not be the case. Meaning the only way to know that you’re safe to disobey an order on the grounds that it’s illegal is to know exactly what law is being broken. Not a thing that soldiers are trained to know.
That, plus, in that moment you have to have a mountain of conviction to resist doing the thing they’ve been drilling into your head since basic, follow orders without thinking. Which is why I’m saying it amounts to nothing more than “the common soldiers aren’t supposed to follow illegal orders, this is all their fault for not stopping this” as a justification.
Yeah, no shit. Need to make things that people buy in order for that to budge. Tariffs don’t do shit for “trade deficits” (which, like, what does that even mean if you’re the global currency?) and never will.