Billegh

Whether or not it did enough people thought it did for it to get really popular, and then when those features went away get significantly less popular. I never used it but judging from how its popularity rose and fell: probably.

Probably, considering that it was enough to get the company to the point that it could go public. And for the company to lose 54% of its “value” after changing it.

If everything is backups, everything is production. Truly a galaxy brain solution.

Privacy? You can’t have privacy.

It’s to block access to CSAM. Shame it blocks everything else.

Like any god fearing christian; by asking her first.

And from the same developer. It’s almost as though who makes the game is just as important. 😉

Except for those neets complaining that Ciri isn’t “hot” for some reason.

Maybe, but I’d still rather buy from steam than any of the other stores right now. Steam at least makes an effort to look like they have your back.

Surprise! It was another rapist.

I wasn’t comparing badness or abuse, I was comparing autonomy. In the US they have the option to use the legal system to fight against things they don’t want to do. Usually ineffective, sure. But the option is there. Not so in China.

No, but a “company” in China has far less autonomy from the government in China than one in the US. For some people, that can be stressful

Fuck them gently with a chainsaw.

I guess what they don’t understand is if you haven’t been doing felonies, an investigation is only stressful if they’re making up evidence. They think this will be as stressful for their opponents as it was for them.

The concern was that it uses a “liquid metal” thermal interface, and that if the system overheated while vertical it could migrate away from the hot zones. This is a potential issue with thermal grizzly’s liquid metal product, requiring occasional maintenance. Apparently the ps5 doesn’t have that issue.

While the understanding would be nice to have, I suspect it is more a lack of backbone than anything else.

But 0x80 is how you’d normally express 128 as hex. So it’s relevant. But deliberately confusing.

And hopefully you never will

It was IBM’s binary to character transform. DB2 can still use it if you configure it to do so. Or was at least as of the version from 1998 that I had to replace.

I would have pegged EBCDIC for that, but ok

I sincerely hope that if they come up with a 128bit instruction set they call it “x80” to maintain backwards compatibility with previous set names and be deliberately confusing to everyone.