Blockchain game ownership.

There are quite a few videos from different perspectives of the same incident. I do not think that weak language is warranted.

Perhaps it was at the time of posting, but it’s clear in the video that at least one of Ice clearly fucked up.

Probably what they wrote.

No, my friend… Shits and giggles.

For alcohol, just deny it oxygen once it just gets going. You don’t have to prevent exposure to acetobacter.

…when the beast is intelligent enough to operate within civilization, but fails to grasp the basic concept of working together. …or, when seeing threat everywhere, the concept of taking a nonthreatening stance seems nonsensical.

Industrious as fuck, but no sense of other people’s boundaries.

Nah… 2fa is better, and generally passkey is stored on other peoples’ servers.

We need something like anon blockchain passkey.

I mean, if you get the hash and salt (which must be stored if present), then getting a very large subset of the passwords from that isn’t too hard.

Yes… There’s reason for this language… “appears to,” “alleged criminal,” etc.

…but as you say, there’s no need for that language here. There is no ambiguity.

Its pronounced “aggitate.”

you mean, run non-steam games on steam deck, using your existing files?

if so, you’ll need to transfer them and duplicate what the installer does, in a Wine environment like proton, and that’s prone to error and subtle necessities, like this or that software / windows component not being present. it’s honestly not worth it. you can’t (or usually can’t) do this windows->windows, and it’s even harder to go windows->Linux (wine).

if you mean, transfer the steam games from windows to deck, then just enable local sharing.

I agree, to some significant extent. But I don’t agree with the suppression of violence, here. Rather, it should be channeled into the ranks of said organized alternatives.

…but if there are no organized alternatives, and someone loses their shit, they should do a little research and aim at the most egregious lawnreakers first.

The casus belli argument might be meaningful if they weren’t already bellicose, and actively pursuing violence. So go hide in a corner.

that said, I don’t advocate violence yet (until, perhaps, an actual dictatorship is established and election terms are violated). It’s still a situation that has potential to be resolved internally, with law, come the elections this year - if there’s meaningful action by the representation.

However, if someone loses their shit, I argue that they should do their homework and go for the most dire of lawbreakers first.

don’t pretend your mind doesn’t work well enough to comprehend what I’m saying.

The specific violence is highly contextual. And it’s wise to be light on specifics, but for historical examples you can look up the history of German and Austrian resistance fighters in Germany during and prior to world war 2 if you like. Efforts both peaceful and violent had an impact and contributed to the allied victory.

A good example would be finding specific individuals who have broken the law and killed people, but who have avoided any legal repercussion, and ensuring that there is a repercussion.

It’s definitely not an action that should be taken wildly, or while on tilt. but we’re approaching the point of needing that kind of action.

they did. It was called World War 2.

Chad Bose.

this is the argument that caused people to permit the Nazis.

Yep. Investing should tie you to a stock for at least a year - as soon as you decide to sell, the one-year timer starts.