Formerly /u/Zagorath on the alien site.

  • 11 Posts
  • 139 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle








  • It may not be an issue anymore (I don’t recall hearing about it in a while, but I’m not sure how long), but it used to be the case that there were two countries that were often regarded as EU troublemakers, and by working together, even though they didn’t agree much of the time, they could veto any attempts to undermine each other. I think the other troublemaker was Poland, and I think it may have been before their last election, but that’s a lot of unsurity.

    Suspension, fwiw, requires unanimity apart from the country in question, so one single dissenter can prevent it.


  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoCanada@lemmy.caCould Canada join the European Union?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    The EU requires unanimity among its existing members in order to add a new member. It’s not impossible, but getting Orban to agree to it is, I think, a much bigger stumbling block than the article implies. Any “concessions” Orban demands to accept Canada would themselves have to be unanimously agreed to by existing members.



  • If you’re asking for money to fix bugs, that incentivises writing code with bugs, as if you write perfect code first time nobody will pay you to fix it

    There’s certainly potential for that to be a problem. But it’s not necessarily insurmountable. For starters, I think the idea is you’re not paying to have your thing fixed, you’re paying to have your thing prioritised. The same amount of work is getting done either way, but bugs reported by people who paid will be prioritised over bugs reported by people who don’t pay. If there are no bugs reported by paid users, then unpaid bugs will still be worked on.