• 12 Posts
  • 238 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • We honestly need to end the myth that Wikipedia is some impenetrable white tower.

    It’s a perpetual two-edged conversation. On the one end, you’ve got reactionaries doggedly insisting the existence of Wikipedia is an attack on their personal reputations and a warehouse for far-left ultra-communist radical propaganda. On the other, you’ve got a very naked western bias to articles (thanks to a preponderance of western editors) and this creeping pay-to-play model of participation that enthusiasts and supporters simply refuse to acknowledge.

    The utility of the site is such that nobody is really excited about ignoring it and replacing it is a herculean effort even would-be trillionaires haven’t managed. So the fight continues to be over degrees of control in editing existing articles and publishing new ones.

    It isn’t a White Tower, but Wikipedia has become - like it or not - a system of record with an implicit amount of reflexive trust that hundreds of millions of people have learned to adopt. You can’t cynically reject its contents any more than you can naively accept them.

    You think people break into the Louvre but can’t touch Wikipedia?

    I think there are enough copies of the Mona Lisa such that we wouldn’t need to question what it looks like if the original was stolen.

    In the same way, there are so many backups and mirrors and third-party logs of Wikipedia that we can very clearly see what is being changed and by whom. It is valuable in large part because it is so easily auditable. That’s not to say its infallible, but you can at least point to what you disagree with and challenge it piecemeal. This isn’t like a Grok AI or Conservapedia, where the preponderance is a black box of bullshit.



  • People keep saying this. The European states keep bending over for American military and diplomatic services.

    Until the EU can decouple from the western tech and finance sectors (don’t hold your breath), they’re chained to the US economy and exposed to US tariff threats. And until they kick out the myriad of military bases, they’re beholden to the Pentagon. Europeans talked about decoupling during Trump 1. They talked about it during Bush 43. They talked about it during Reagen, ffs.

    The only country that’s ever demonstrated an ounce of seriousness has been France. Every other country seems more than willing to take the American coin and bend the knee. And for all the bluster, I’m still waiting to see the rest of Europe take the threat of American hegemony seriously. Last I checked, Greenland is queuing up to get more American military bases, which doesn’t look like decoupling to me.














  • Any suggestion that there’s something questionable or unreliable about the American democratic process is a trick by the Republican Party to suppress liberal voter enthusiasm. And if you mention it you are helping the Republicans win. Also Russia.

    If you’re still in line, stay in line. Our elections are secure. The midterms is winnable if you vote in it. Shut up and do what we tell you or you’re an enemy.