Yep. That’s my understanding.
The switch 1 cartridge will just work on switch 2; however, if you want to play in 4k, you need to buy the upgrade DLC.
Personally, I think that’s still pretty underwhelming given it looks like they aren’t providing any additional content in the switch 2 version/upgrade dlc (other than sharing zonite designs and a gps app).
Maybe I’m wrong and it’s more “remasterful” but I guess we’ll find out soon.
The switch 2 is but I believe if you want the enhancements, you have to pay a fee to upgrade.
This article is about buying the switch 2 edition of the game when you have never previously owned the game or DLC.
Interesting. For games consoles, the markup for retail is probably like 10 percent or less. So the final price in your example would be between 122.50 and 125 anyway, right?
*Also, my source on the 10% is a random Reddit commenter so take that with a grain of salt
Yeah you definitely need it for the movement to flow. I’ve seen a lot of comments lamenting that they took too long to introduce it.
The movement in Sunset Overdrive is amazing and I think was the base for the movement in Spiderman since it’s made by the same developer. I preferred the movement in Sunset Overdrive, personally.
You have to get to the point that you get the air dash for it to be smooth and you can chain together your parkour movement across the entire city
The humour is a bit divisive/hit or miss though and the open world is a little dead by today’s standards.
True in regards to the index kit but WMR has been around for a long time as well and that was a fraction of the price without base stations.
Also nobody has missed out on playing it yet! There’s still time before half life 3! 😅
Plenty of people do that to play a single game.
Given how different it is to other, normal 3d games, I don’t think the comparison is fair. Additionally there are a lot of other, really great games in VR too.
Regardless, I don’t think the problem is financial anymore. Rather that VR requires a sort of “commitment to inconvenience” where you feel cut off from the outside world (among other things) that I don’t think a lot of people are comfortable with.
It is such a beautiful game. One of my top gaming experiences.
The environments, the pacing, the story telling, the interactivity - just excellent.
If you are interested in playing it and you don’t have a PC with a 1060 or better; or can’t afford PSVR2 or Quest 3s, then consider giving it a go at a VR game cafe.
I’m so confused. They were replying to you when you said it was “heartbleed level”, right?
deleted by creator
The remaster of those is already out and IMHO it’s very good.
I saw this video a while back that explained Nintendo’s behaviour and strategy. It’s a bit long and not a direct answer to your question but I found it pretty interesting.
You are using an exclamation mark 4 hours ago: https://sopuli.xyz/comment/14613004
Your post inspired me to share a video about some wacky CES products.
I think I committed a few cardinal sins because it did not go well. Haha
Yep, that’s the joke that this AI summary doesn’t capture too well. Pretty funny, given your comment - though I guess the humour is a little deadpan.
Yeah there is some nightmare fuel out there about online baby monitors:
https://www.wired.com/story/kalay-iot-bug-video-feeds/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/stranger-hacks-baby-monitor-tells-child-i-love-you-n1090046
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/man-hacks-baby-monitor-screams-at-child/rmex6rkxo
The list was in the description of the video, but there’s no need to watch the video if you don’t feel like consuming video right now.
Iit’s a pretty humorous look at some of the more “out there” products at CES and I feel the enjoyment is lost in text but I know what you mean - not everyone has time for every video that’s posted.
Also I didn’t really realise the video title was clickbaity. I just see “Fireship” and I watch.
Apologies if the irony of the headline is not apparent. I suppose you need to know of the content creator to know it’s very tongue in cheek.
You absolutely do not need any of these right now (or probably ever).
The quote says that app stores should be responsible for verifying age, but social media is not limited to apps - they’re just one of multiple user interfaces for interacting with social networks. So that alone cannot solve the problem.
Sorry for the confusion
This isn’t stupid. To me, this is yet another potential tool to erode privacy.
Even if it’s right only half of the time, that might be enough to reasonably guess your location based on your image uploads, particularly if you have uploaded more than one image, or a video.