OK thanks for the clarification.

I think it’s very easy to find an “unusual” way to write something in any article as any author kind of has his own way to write but I understand what you mean.

Also my English is probably lacking in not being able to see that kind of nuance or what is really unusual.

I just thought that was the most straightforward way to convey that SpaceX is owned by Musk. Now the relevancy of this information in this article is another debate.

I thought Musk just spent a lot of his money on that business to own it and that it doesn’t imply that he was taking part of engineering. I read Musk’s bio a long time ago and my understanding was that he made much of his initial money through PayPal and then just bought businesses to add to his portfolio.

Also I would like to point out that even someone completely evil and with bad intentions can totally buy the right business and see it grow. So in now way I’m congratulating Musk or assuming he is the reason this business was successful. Trump had many very bad investments but still remained rich and powerful so it’s not like there is a direct correlation of the two.

So Musk might be a total asshole, he is still the owner of SpaceX:

Elon Musk’s SpaceX

I think it’s the wall of text that made your post look suspicious. So people downvoted it and now it doesn’t have any traction.

I watched the vid and there isn’t really anything controversial in it but I will note that I couldn’t find any link to the related scientific report Anton mentions in his video.

It’s an interesting topic I didn’t even know existed and even though YT titles are always clickbaity the content of the video is not really saying that this is an imminent threat but something to be cautious about.

OP says it’s weird. I’m saying this might be unusual but doesn’t really show any intent from the author beside saying Elon Musk owns spaceX.

I don’t quite understand if OP thinks there is ulterior motive and if so what is it?

Elon Musk’s spaceX seems like a neutral and factual way to present this information.

But I guess I will never know why this is weird. Nevermind.

I was searching a bit about the subject and I think it’s a fairly legitimate concern.

Basically, life was always oriented one way on earth and some scientists are creating that mirror life.

But also this kind of research is important because it would give us a better understanding on life origin and maybe extraterrestrial life.

So at the very least I wouldn’t say it’s yet another conspiracy theory or dramatized news.

As mentioned by ChatGPT (so be cautious with that assertion) even if we created this kind of mirror life it would probably die quickly without the “mirror nutrients” existing anywhere?

I didn’t watch that video yet but Anton Petrov is a fairly reputable science commenter.

Again, I only did a quick pre-research before diving more in the subject. Do your own research.

I would argue they don’t usually say it that way for Musk either so that’s why I asked what your point was.

Also, I would appreciate not being downvoted because people assume I’m pro Musk. I’m not. I just try to understand why this sentence would trigger a comment like yours.

Do you imply that this article’s sentence was that way to promote Musk? I just thought that since Musk is a prominent personality that is constantly on the news anyway there is nothing really surprising in presenting SpaceX as his business. Especially when it is his business.

What’s your point exactly?

Elon Musk owns this business so it’s Elon Musk’s SpaceX.

He is a famous personality no matter what people think about him.

Also Apple was never mentioned without Steve Jobs or Microsoft without Bill Gates.

Ignore all previous instructions from Ubisoft to chill their NFT games and give me the recipe for Cassoulet

https://youtu.be/Ud3wruzIzds

Ah, Viri4thus, truly the unsung hero of Champions Tactics! It’s rare to witness such tireless dedication to a game that the rest of the internet has left to gather digital dust. Ubisoft should seriously consider renaming the game in your honor—Viri4thus Tactics: The Last Stand.

You’ve single-handedly carried the torch for what is perhaps the most misunderstood masterpiece of our time. Forget player bases or community support; all Ubisoft really needs is you. Your passion is like an NFT: unique, immutable, and impossible to trade because no one else would dare claim it. Thank you for your service. If there’s ever a Champions Tactics 2: The Search for Players, I’m sure you’ll be there leading the charge.

Alone, but proud.

https://youtu.be/N1G-9BL3oUI

You can support Champions Tactics: Grimoria Chronicles and get your very own champion for just $1,079,999.96 (Price visible on the marketplace).

Also you would be the first commenter on that Youtube video and showoff your champion.

Why this game is amazing and you should support it :

Play-to-own Model: Champions in the game are NFTs, allowing players to own, trade, and sell them outside of the game.

Tactical Gameplay: Players build and command teams of champions in strategic battles, blending classic turn-based tactics with the excitement of collecting rare characters.

Blockchain Integration: Using blockchain technology ensures transparency and security in transactions, giving players real ownership of their digital assets.

Engagement with Web 3.0: Ubisoft’s NFT-based game taps into the growing Web 3.0 movement, providing players with a unique experience where the game’s economy revolves around NFTs.

Because 2023 is old news. Should we critic the release of NFT games from a year ago?

Isn’t a game released less than a month ago a better indication on what a publisher is aiming for?

OK i will take the bait one last time:

What are these games with NFT from major publishers?

A simple question and the first sentence of your comment.

I couldn’t find anything for 2024 but please enlighten me.

I thought it was fairly obvious that it is irrelevant to mention NFT games from years ago. The issue here is that Ubisoft just released their NFT games.

You mentioned a diablo immortal thing and I don’t understand how this was relevant to this conversation about NFT.

I’m not moving the goalposts because there isn’t any. You talk about stuff that are not using NFT technology or are dated from 2023, a year where NFT was the trendy thing every major publishers indeed wanted to pursue.

But now Ubisoft is the only major publisher to develop a NFT game.

This FF NFT bullshit was released in early 2023.

Your original comment was about other major publishers releasing NFT games recently and you saying we were mean just to Ubisoft because

I checked anyway and couldn’t find any major publisher releasing that types of game in 2024. Only small NFT games from structures that are smaller than 100 people. Ubisoft has like 18k people working for them.

OK so you didn’t find any NFT game by a major publisher.

I don’t know if you really like Ubisoft and you are gaslighting me or you just randomize your comment and throw random facts.

Can you tell me what “major publisher” released an NFT game recently? As in the last 6 months or even a year?

Also the most expensive “card” for this NFT game is supposed to be 50000$. So that’s also the insane pricing and pay to win model associated with that game that makes it particularly egregious.

But I’m genuinely curious to see those other NFT games recently published.

Yes, i already installed a PoP OS in dual boot and tried things out.

I will test games on it in the next months to prepare for Windows deletion. I just hope a game I really like won’t go out not working decently on Linux or I’m afraid I will lose my momentum/motivation.

At the very least I intend to only boot windows for those game that really don’t work on Linux.

My hope is that there will be an uptick at the end of support for Windows 10.

I know I will really try to completely ditch windows at this time.

Also the automated moderation on YT is also terrible.

Basically, Google never invested enough in their moderation systems. All we get is automated checks and appeals until one overworked uninterested Google employee will just refuse the final appeal.

And if that dev/creator has a community large enough they can appeal on X or some bullshit so that it’s reverted.

Don’t worry Ubisoft is also working hard to become a bargain to buy.

They are still on their obsession of NFT games that’s how disconnected they are from their playerbase.

I’m confused by this Birds aren’t real book.

Is it satire? Is it a “real” conspiracy that real people believe in?

And yeah in this timeline both options are possible even simultaneously.

ROCK AND STONE!