tech

unholy sentence (1st of second paragraph)

why in 3rd person?

good for you and yeah I should have written “you would have lost”

imo you lost nothing, that game is hot garbage

I recently checked out the demo to Static Dread and it ia lit.

to play the devil’s advocate: this can be done to exemplify what you complain about as opposed to complaining about an abstract concept

fr*nch punctuation 🤮

fr*nch punctuation 🤮

Are you certain it works this way? I find it hard to believe

it’s not about a photo

they’re Swiss

fewer

the main takeaway about things working between federal nation states is that they work like they work because there is no-one above federal nation states to tell them how jurisdiction works in such cases.

If powerful enough nation says that they have jurisdiction and no-one opposes them then they have it.

I fear that Germany might not want to anger the us.

Your analogy doesn’t work, since that is a crime that involves a us citizen. Moreover us claims jurisdiction of anyone all over the world uses usd.

With the heil we have a “victimless” crime that takes place in the other country and doesn’t involve anyone who is German (or uses German currency).

This is comparable to Poland wanting to prosecute people who go to have abortions abroad. Or Texas trying to prosecute people going for abortions to other states. This is just not how jurisdiction works.

How can it be prosecuted under German law if not done in Germany?

The repercussions I’d like to see is twitter ban. At least for the government organisations.

EDIT: why the downvotes, the question is legitimate.

That’s the way they do it, these accounts belong to the current potus and vp

there absolutely was

Whoosh