They do all the national testing and data collections for determining school rankings.

Which I think is the main thing they want to get rid of. They’ve said that all the school funding functions can be handed to other departments. But it’s all the states with religious curriculum requirements that frequently do poorly on the rankings. And us in New Mexico. But by eliminating the DOE that data collection and ranking will stop.

That’s exactly how not to encourage people to be better.
Wouldn’t you like for him to be better? Or are you just more comfortable in a black and white world of, once bad always bad?

Guy does the right thing and you call him an asshole for it.

Politics isn’t a one dimensional spectrum. We use terms like left, right, and center. But that ignores other directions like up and down, forward and back.

Forward doesn’t mean center. Open primaries for example. Both Republicans and Democrats fight against them. Are open primaries Left or Right? Or something else?

The truth is neither of our parties are responsive to the people. Democrats proved it in the last nomination, basically ignoring anyone that wasn’t Biden/Harris. Republicans are proving it now, in their refusal to do town halls. Supporting a party that’s literally being built to respond bottom up, rather than top down; And isn’t beholden to the traditional media driven, overly simplistic “Left” “Right” duopoly, can only be a good thing.

This video may help.

Support the [Forward Party](https ://forwardparty.com)

That sounds good.
I’m not saying that they shouldn’t be able to interoperate at all. Just that this kind of thing isn’t, and never will be ideal. I’m pushing back on the idea, that one account for all the Fediverse is the best and greatest, that everyone should be striving for that goal.

It’s a principal of reality. Trying to make something that can do everything, will mean it’s not great at anything. Specialization is what allows society to grow to what it is. The Fediverse is no different.

Support the Forward Party, and Represent.US

Support the Forward Party, and Represent.US

That’s entirely dependent on the interface switching, or some kind of universal interface. That’s the part I have serous doubts about. Keep in mind you have to make a single interface that work better than all the others on their respective native systems. I’m not sure that’s possible.

That would be cool. Might be useful. Not sure it’s really possible.

Which I would never respond to on Mastodon, as it’s terrible for discussions.

I follow topics and have discussions on Lemmy, keep up with individuals and announcements on Mastodon, and look at cool photos on Pixelfed.
None of my accounts are following anything on other systems.

The reason I’m in this community is for discussions like this. We disagree on the nature of using he fundamental architecture of the Fediverse.
I think using Mastodon to engage in Lemmy discussions is extremely awkward without the threading to keep it all organized. Equally, Lemmy is designed specifically around following communities. Following individuals on Mastodon breaks the pattern of the feed. And good luck following either Mastodon accounts or Lemmy groups in Pixelfed.

However, having multiple decentralized servers within each system, is plenty of reason for the Fediverse to be better than a centralized platform. They don’t Need to interoperate with each other.

I have literally zero interest in cross pollination between social media types.
They each have their own interfaces that work best for their communities and content types. You’re always missing something trying to access one from another.

Being in police custody, means they are legally responsible for his health and safety.
They can require something like a vest on those grounds.

deleted by creator

Wait. What?
Is that why some people downvoted?
Would you be willing to explain how pointing out the actual order is fascist?
To me it’s just what the news is supposed to do. But didn’t. For reasons.
I never said anything sporting or defending it. The closest I got was saying, it probably won’t matter much to anything. Which as far as I can tell is true. If you can explain how that’s wrong I’d love to hear that also.

Yes.
Op isn’t expecting an all or nothing. I’m suggesting they should expect nothing. All isn’t even worth talking about.

And yes.
I’ve never deleted anything online. Never had a reason to. If I ever imagined a reason I’d want to delete something, I wouldn’t post it to begin with. Because I know I can’t delete it. See how that works. So what if I was wrong, or embarrassing, that’s part of being human, own you’re mistakes and move on. Don’t hide them. They are who you were. They are how you got where you are. They’re responsible for who you’ve become. Take pride in the failings of your past.

All quislings are traitors.
Not all traitors are quislings.
The difference is, being in service to an occupying force.

I don’t really disagree with any of that. And I don’t see how it suggests anything I wrote was wrong.
Unless you’re suggesting conscientious objector stuff, replace my idea of whistleblower stuff. To which I can say… Sure? I guess? I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know enough about the details to know the difference.

Quisling:
“someone who collaborates with an enemy occupying force”