• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 4th, 2024
  • Sickday@kbin.earthtoGames@sh.itjust.works•[Mujin] It's Time to Accept That Nintendo is a Supervillain
    21·
    15 days ago

    Ubisoft Paris Mobile, Ubisoft Ivory Tower, Ubisoft Nadeo, Ubisoft Montreal, Ubisoft Owlient, Ubisoft Da Nang, Ubisoft Paris, Ubisoft Toronto, Ubisoft Quebec, Ubisoft Annecy, Ubisoft Chengdu, Ubisoft San Francisco, Ubisoft Milan, Ubisoft Mumbai, Ubisoft Düsseldorf, Ubisoft Mainz, Ubisoft Bordeaux, Ubisoft Montpellier, Ubisoft Singapore, Ubisoft Saguenay, and Ubisoft Bucharest to name a few are Ubisoft and they produce and publish games.

    Yes, these are all their children studios. Ubisoft Entertainment (colloquially referred to as just Ubisoft), as an entity, is a video game publisher.

    Does that make all their children studios AAA? A lot of them don’t have massive employee numbers and their budget per game varies greatly lol.

  • Sickday@kbin.earthtoGames@sh.itjust.works•[Mujin] It's Time to Accept That Nintendo is a Supervillain
    43·
    15 days ago

    Ubisoft is a publisher, not a game dev studio. They publish games made by their child studios. They don’t produce games themselves.

    Larian has less than a 1000 employees

    Yes, they have 500 employees which would be quite large for an Indie development studio.

    DICE (studio behind the Battlefield games), for example, has 700 employees. CD Project RED, (Cyberpunk, Witcher games), has 615 employees.

    If budget is the qualifier for AAA, Larian has put out multiple massive budgeted games in both BG3 and Divinity 2. I’m not sure which metric would disqualify Larian as being a AAA studio.

  • Sickday@kbin.earthtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Framework supporting far-right racists?
    16·
    30 days ago

    A bit surprised there was no discussion about this on any Fediverse instances.

    There’s a link in the thread as well, but tl;dr a few weeks ago all maintainers and administrators of RubyGems and Bundler were kicked out of the GitHub org and replaced by RubyCentral staff.

    Here’s another article better explaining the situation https://thenewstack.io/open-source-turmoil-rubygems-maintainers-kicked-off-github/

    As far as what DHH has to do with this, the article shared in the actual framework thread goes into better detail.

    https://joel.drapper.me/p/rubygems-takeover/

    About six hours after Ellen broke the news, Ruby Central published their response: Strengthening the Stewardship of RubyGems and Bundler.

    A post that feels like AI-generated corporate speak and bears no signature from anyone at Ruby Central willing to take responsibility.

    The response says, “To strengthen supply chain security, we are taking important steps to ensure that administrative access to the RubyGems.org, RubyGems, and Bundler is securely managed. This includes both our production systems and GitHub repositories. In the near term we will temporarily hold administrative access to these projects while we finalize new policies that limit commit and organization access rights. This decision was made and approved by the Ruby Central Board as part of our fiduciary responsibility.”

    But while Ruby Central has the right to lock down the RubyGems.org Service infrastructure, it never owned the RubyGems GitHub repositories.

    DHH ignored Ellen’s post but instead retweeted the Ruby Central announcement with the caption “Ruby Central is making the right moves to ensure the Ruby supply chain is beyond reproach both technically and organisationally.”

    A position that seems to stand in stark contrast to his other opinions. For example, he criticised Apple’s control of the App Store and takes the ownership of his own open source projects seriously.