Another thing that a lot of Conservatives will fight you tooth and nail over, but if you say they want to move back to a society where things a dictated by Christian values they’ll nod in agreement. This also discounts a bunch of the most popular Conservatives personalities literally saying it.
For people wondering about the general creditability of the source.
Wall Street Journal quietly walks back false claim Charlie Kirk shooter had pro-trans messages on his bullets
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/wall-street-journal-quietly-walks-182931692.html
For anyone wondering it shows ~9m people eligible in 2025 in the original doc titled: A Proposed Framework for the Canadian Dental Care Plan from the Dentist Association
Also I think it should be mentioned that the wording used in the StatCan data is “Approved applicants”.
I watched a video about how many progressive movements was at one point lofty dreams before they became reality which somewhat swayed my belief in how things can be campaigned politically.
In itself I do there’s space for this, but it seems like it’s shoving things that’ll more conducive on getting movement on the issue like voting reform to the side. Or in your analogy a lot of the people in Canada want the patient dead and the current system caters to them, so having these theoretical discussions about how we could keep them alive doesn’t change that. We either need to change those people beliefs or change the way politics work.
I don’t mean to single this post out because I’m bringing it up since it happens a lot.
But why do we keep having these housing talks that have no basis of reality. Specifically isn’t it almost universally believed that if the government thought something they passed would noticeably lower housing prices it be repealed by the end of the week.
It’s like going into a personal finance space and 90% is what would you do if you won the lottery.
For anyone paying attention to the American side e.i. Conservatives’ wet dream. They’ve probably noticed that the tariffs has been a lot worse for small businesses compared to the corporate counter parts.
It’s a large reason why they’ve been such willing participants in the whole thing since to short pains for substantial consolidations of the market.
Such a rare take these days.
Bauer said the whole system is “struggling.”
“I pay a lot of taxes and I want the transit to be good,” he said. “As a growing city, we really need to be doing better when it comes to our transit, especially with people being called back to work.”
The right wing take of taxation is theft is mediocre but the left has also become really bad at this as well.
Like the recent with Canada Post here. Even in a casual setting where no one is vying for populist votes there’s still no room to scrutinize the current day operations and reassess whether those resources would be better reallocated.
Haven’t seen any formal statements beyond ambiguous things.
Aaron Gunn name is rumoured for the BC Conservatives leadership so maybe it was because they weren’t nutty enough.
From the horses ass if anyone is wondering what Pierre had to say about this. Once again it’s got nothing to do with him even though it’s the 3rd MP he’s lost. And if anyone was wondering a peeked into some Canadian Conservative subs, the popular sentiment amongst them is Pierre is decent and this all happened because they’re victims of bad people doing bad things as usual.
https://xcancel.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1999269453846966434
The context beyond the title. The article did not include numbers of net new doctors this is expected to yield.
The federal government is promising to open up permanent residency for foreign doctors working in Canada as temporary foreign residents in order to tackle the doctor shortage across the country.
…
“Many of these doctors are already treating patients in our communities. We cannot afford to lose them,” Diab said.
The reasoning and the article has a link to the judgement if people want the super long legal version of it.
Favel said in both decisions the Canadian government made First Nations dependent by forcing them to relocate to reserves, and that the country has historically “exerted direct control over every facet of First Nations life through legislation, regulations, policies, and practices,” including control over financing for water infrastructure and housing.
Also the personal opinion part you’d think Pierre and the Conservatives would applaud this given the stance on “government tyranny”.
This quote:
Now, the Cowichan Tribes have publicly stated that private owners cannot sell their properties without Cowichan consent,[15] and lenders are refusing to renew mortgages because the collateral is now legally defective.
With this foot note:
[15] https://www.conservative.ca/canada-must-defend-property-rights/
“The lead lawyer for the Cowichan Tribes has already stated that private land sales would need the consent of the Cowichan before they could go ahead.
I could only find this in writing.
Vancouver Sun article
He meant if owners of those lands attempted to sell to anyone else. The transaction would need the consent of the Cowichan before it could go ahead, Rosenberg told CKNW host Jas Johal recently.
“I fully anticipate that the seller or vendor will get what they are bargaining for, and the purchaser would also get what they are bargaining for,” said Rosenberg.
“But it would be with the consent of the Cowichan Nation and it would be with some accommodation from the Crown (government) to the Cowichan Nation.”
That is a big change already. No wonder Sharma has been expediting work on the appeal.
I then found this clip for the interview and I’m going have to say getting information from the Conservative.ca is already questionable but the way the author framed it is even worse.
Here’s the clip for people who want to hear the entire context of it.
2m21s length.
https://xcancel.com/search?f=tweets&q=1955051040942002473&since=&until=&near=
Ford is Ford and the conservatives is pretty upfront about this stuff. They just say it’ll somehow be good for the public.
It does take someone special after seeing housing in Canada to think we should do the same thing with water.
I think the program is poorly ran and in itself probably isn’t conducive to anything significant for Canadians.
But letting Alberta get away with this type of jurisdictional overreach is going to end poorly.
This motion, if passed, could put RCMP officers serving in Alberta in a bind, because they fall under federal jurisdiction. Amery said it’s up to that agency to choose whether they follow Ottawa’s directive.
Voyager.
This is a small community but you gotta do better than trust me bro and I’m saying this while looking at a +11 on my user tagger.
This seems to be the deadline on how this turns out for the pipeline. I’d save the positive comments of Carney till then.
There’s actually a fair bit of other to stuff to decifer in the docs as well.
The application for this pipeline project will be ready to submit to the Major Projects Office on or before July 1, 2026.
This format isnt very popular these days. Most people actually reading these type of article is going to be presented with information they’ve seen quite a few times. Now with links and tool tips it really isn’t a lot of reason to rehash things to this extent.
I do see why they would put in a magazine.
If BC gets the short end of the deal like TMX this should be a big vote loser for the Liberals. If there’s a significant environmental thing that happens I could see the Liberal votes collapsing in BC.
There is a significant possibility of Smith not being someone actually wanting to spend 30B+ on a pipeline in 2025.
Referendums and the specific topic is a bit different. But I think looking at Trump and America should make people very wary of what having 30% of the population as fanatics can do.