It’s still around, and it still sucks: https://nuclearplayer.com/

That’s exactly what’s happening

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/11/asia/south-korea-ice-raids-georgia-trump-intl-hnk

https://molly.im/

Is this the first time a major politician has claimed something to be AI in order to deflect criticism?

Nah, not for suicide:

But in the post warning users that the company will call the authorities if they seem like they’re going to hurt someone, OpenAI also acknowledged that it is “currently not referring self-harm cases to law enforcement to respect people’s privacy given the uniquely private nature of ChatGPT interactions.”

Dollars a share is meaningless, you must look at marketcap

You can’t buy BYD cars in the US. Out of sight, out of mind.

Proton upstreams to Wine a lot. You can tell by the number of patches they have keeps fluctuating

Antisemites gonna antisemite

/s because it’s 2025

And people ask why I support him…

I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides

Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?

JK we all know the answer … 🤡

Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves

Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content

If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight

You don’t need to go to the hospital for a sprained ankle

No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)

Rare Australia W

There’s a lot of really bad slop on YouTube. Your algorithm might be curated to “documentaries”, but that’s far from the norm

Putting a title on it (I.e. “Big beautiful bill”) doesn’t mean it is a big, beautiful bill.

I’m not skeptical of DEI because I’m against “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, I’m skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce

These responses closely mirrored examples of the false claim from pro-China sources, which alleged that Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was suppressing opposition voters by deliberately withholding voter notifications.

There’s two things at play here. First, all models being released these days have safety built into the training. In the West, we might focus on preventing people from harming others or hacking, and in China, they’re preventing people from getting politically supportive of China. But in a way, we are all “exporting” our propaganda.

Second, as called out in the article, these responses are clearly based on the training data. That is where the misinformation starts, and you can’t “fix” the problem without first fixing that data.