Bike busses sadly need to exist BECAUSE safety precautions are not in place.

Children should be walk to walk or bike to school safely, without worring about being struck by a car driver.

Reforming street design so that children who live inside of the bus range are able to walk or roll to school safetly removes the requirement for bike busses. That children or their parents should be worried at all on residential streets is a huge failing of our transportation network.

That’s literally what we were just talking about, the party platforms and the leader’s ability to discuss them.

The neat thing about government privacy, os that it’s way stronger than everything the private sector does.

Why does my car collect my sexual history? I don’t know, but I garanti they resell it.

I love how Canadians shit on the Bloc Québécois, but if you post their platform without a name attached everyone thinks it’s the greatest party ever.

Land Value Tax would fix this.

This is a clip from This Hour Has 22 Minutes’ new years special.

Have shit not burn down doesn’t make money, but it stops losing money.

I think e-bikes are a better stop gap. They can scrap a lot of car trips entirely, sand the same batteries for one electric car can power 20+ e-bikes.

Nunavut does not, but that’s because it’s organized as a territory, rather than a province. Big differences in sub-national governance.

So Nunavut could join the ranks of USVI, Guam, Samoa, Puerto Rico, etc.

" there is, literally no way to fact check any of this."

You could just read the bill?

There is nothing about sports in the hill, or touching. The good faith section is about protecting persons who recommend, or not, council before parental notification.

Edit: this doesn’t mean I support the bill. It even makes sex Ed opt-in except for religious schools…

I hoped on board because the threat of losing my job was removed.

I’ve got no problem with exporting Canadian Oil & Gas.

BUT don’t get high on your own supply. Internal hydrocarbon sales do nothing for the economy; electrify our shit, get people out of personal cars, and charge the shit out of the rest of the world for the product.

I’d you can’t see the difference between between an invasion of privacy that’s a made up scenario in your head and isn’t present at other congestion pricing cities; and an existing one that already plagues cars, I give up.

If your car is less than 15 years old, it’s location data (and way, way more information, like your sex life) is already being gathered and sold my the manufacturer. If your car is 15-35 years old, it’s decreasingly probable. (And less data is collected).

No active congestion pricing system uses transponder, they all use cameras. Not sure why Toronto would be different?

I agree with MPP French on a lot of things, but not this.

If the 407 sits half empty, that means people would rather pay with their time on the 401, than their money on the 407. That’s their decision.

Making the 407 also free will just make both highways size up and probably induce even more traffic.

As I said elsewhere, just ban street parking and the problem evaporates. There is no more car traffic generation or precived blocking of emergency vehicles.

The problem is cars not people.

File a permit with the city to put up Holiday decorations. Ludacris. Do I need one if I put a tree inside my house?

Downtown Kingsville to the edge of the suburbs is about 2km in the furthest directions.

So the issue is that the city has decided to not build sidewalks for super walkable distances, there are more than enough lots around.

So it’s a traffic problem, not a capacity problem.

Ban on street parking, direct people to the closest lots. Problem solved.