I see a golden opportunity to integrate react into angular!

Nothing there yet on the website.

I scroll down and the page turns black with a text in the middle

Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information).

well that’s a first for me…

you evil AI you! /s

Unless you continuously change you IP I don’t see how locking DNS resolution behind a signup would solve it. You only need to resolve once, and then you know the mapping of domain to IP and can use it elsewhere. That mapping doesn’t change often for hosted services.

Any wall you build up will also apply to regular users you want to reach.

They’re using svn for sources :( mirrored to GitHub at least.

Damn, for a thief they’re really stomping and dragging (if that’s the right en term) their feet in the test video. Such loud and sandy foot steps.

and include expensive endpoints like git blame, every page of every git log, and every commit in your repository. They do so using random User-Agents from tens of thousands of IP addresses, each one making no more than one HTTP request, trying to blend in with user traffic.

That’s insane. They also mention crawling happening every 6 hours instead of only once. And the vast majority of traffic coming from a few AI companies.

It’s a shame. The US won’t regulate - and certainly not under the current administration. China is unlikely to.

So what can be done? Is this how the internet splits into authorized and not? Or into largely blocked areas? Maybe responses could include errors that humans could identify and ignore but LLMS would not to poison them?

When you think about the economic and environmental cost of this it’s insane. I knew AI is expensive to train and run. But now I have to consider where they leech from for training and live queries too.

That’s what the major part of version numbers is all about! /s

Thanks.

Seeing the list, I determined it’s not for me. But seeing Trac on that list for “best” invalidates the whole thing for me. I always hated Trac UI.

Neo4j provided database software under the AGPLv3, then tweaked the license, leading to legal battles over forks of the software. The AGPLv3 includes language that says any added restrictions or requirements are removable, meaning someone could just file off Neo4j’s changes to the usage and distribution license, reverting it back to the standard AGPLv3, which the biz has argued and successfully fought against in that California district court.

The issue before the appeals court boils down to the right to remove contractual restrictions added to the terms of the APGL. This right is spelled out in AGPLv3, section 7, paragraph 4: “If the program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this license along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.” Other GPLs contain similar terms.

“Licensed under AGPL but not AGPL”? It’s a named license that people have expectations on. I assume if they had said “licensed under aa modified AGPL license” it would have been fine? Seems reasonable/makes sense.

How does that become “may kill a GPL license”? Key word “a”? (When it’s not one.)

How does it handle secrets, like a copied password I wouldn’t want to have or keep in history?

Is this limited to Swift?

Swift Build is a high-level build system based on llbuild with great support for building Swift.

Sounds like this won’t help C++ projects?

The requirements of sold developer license, physical mac hardware, and XCode make it hard to be interested or even feel it worthwhile unless you’re already a mac user.

Cloud build options only get you so far as well.

Where is he getting these stats from?

What do you mean? He’s the room owner. He can see the member count, and the activity.

I thought the same at first, but honestly, there’s probably nothing that warrants impersonation. If it’s a system announcement or change from the host, it should be labeled as such.

Any previous contributor can bring them to court for violation of license / copyright violation. They contributed under Apache 2, which has conditions. They’re redistributing without meeting those conditions.

I’m not sure how that applies to third parties. They seem to be misrepresenting what they’re distributing. Seems like that would be sueable by anyone. At the latest, after becoming a customer and paying, under false advertised premises, anyone could sue them.

Really cool

I see; it’s not button keys, but axis inputs

/edit: Apparently not just axis, but “3D” / free joypad/stick

choosealicense.com is great for an overview of common licenses.

deleted by creator

The page starting with a popover donation call doesn’t help either…