Fuck that Nazi cunt and the goose stepping wannabe.

Wide open grifting.

It’s funny you’d think that people from Louisiana would know a thing or two about swamps and what lives there.

Pretty sure the Danes weren’t quiet.

A lot of countries require the equivalent of probable cause to do a cavity search before entering institutions like prisons, jails, or asylums as a prisoner or patient.

Lol, doesn’t read the summary, uses overly broad terms and then points the finger at someone else.

Are ya sure?

From the summary:

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Any other arguments that are D.O.A?

The point of the matter is the previous poster said that it was standard, my response proved it wasn’t.

If you read even the summary you will see that it wasn’t uniformly implemented.

From the same article

United States edit

In the United States, Bell v. Wolfish is the benchmark case on this issue. In its judgment of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard of reasonable grounds for performing cavity searches. Among these are security concerns at prisons. Such searches are generally governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits searches without probable cause.[3]

Then why are they saying only the women had to do this?

Edit: I’ve never had a cavity search any of the times I have been arrested.

And the USMCA tends to favour Canada and Mexico.

No.

Look up CO2 and halon extinguishers.

Edit: also dry chemical and emulsifiers.

I know you didn’t bring up the fire extinguisher, but you displayed a misunderstanding about how they opperate and how that would affect a fire.

I don’t know if you normally get this upset when you make mistakes, but calling people bots accusations of ad hominem because you doubled down on a bad analogy just shows that you aren’t better than you claim me to be.

You apparently don’t know how extinguishers work.

Try and put out a fire with an empty fire extinguisher, tell me how far you get and whether it had a positive (less fire) or negative (same or more fire) effect.

The point is the method is not effective and allowing the problem to continue makes the problem harder to deal with.

Edit: a full fire extinguisher is pressurized unless it utilizes a hand pump, so filled with air denotes that it would be pressurized or that the medium used is air and will be pumped (which will behave like a bellows).

An unpressurized extinguisher is considered empty unless it is manually operated.

Yup, and I still think that any use of belladonna should have oversight from regulatory and medical professionals due to the fact that if you fuck up bad enough you (or others) die.

Yeah, my mistake. I should have said typical general ignorance.

Not being able to put out a fire isn’t the absence of a negative effect. It allows the fire to grow larger. Which is a negative effect.

Ah, so typical american ignorance