I’m not sure why you refuse to hold him and his administration accountable. Genocide Joe is an apt name for someone that chose to give more importance to genocide then he did to representing his voters and this country in general.

They sabotaged their own election so Israel can break child death records. He could have simply told Israel to fuck off. I’d rather blame them then normal people that felt conflicted about genocide of all things.

Holding them accountable is also the only way we get real change.

That’s fair. We can also expect proper moderation from social media sites. I’m okay with a light touch but It shouldn’t be floating around if you get what I mean.

Banning the tech, banning generated cp on the internet or banning it at home?

I’m a big advocate of AI and don’t personally want any kind of banning or censorship of the tools.

I don’t think it should be published on any kind of image sharing sites. I don’t hold people publishing it in high regard and I’m not against some kind of consequence. I generally view prison as unproductive though.

At home, I’m not sure. People imo can do what they want behind closed doors. I don’t want any kind of surveillance but I don’t know how I would react if it got brought up at a trial, as a kind of proof if the allegations have something to do with that theme (child molestation).

I also don’t think we need much of a reason to ban it on the web.

Why did you use the quotes?

deleted by creator

If only half of the deaths are true (the articles talks about 3400 removed deaths), it’s still a genocide.

Do you have an expression for rabid genocide supporting zionists? How many mistaken deaths is the minimum for a genocide to become acceptable?

Thankfully, those are just a very small percentage of protesters and the rest just want Israel to stop it’s genocidal baby killing machine.

Kids will do things if they see other children doing it in pictures and videos. It’s easier to normalize sexual behavior with cp then without.

any true fiscal conservative would want to direct as much of our money as needed into these programs

You simply aren’t a fiscal conservative. All your points are directly against fiscal conservatism.

From the wiki, which sums it up nicely:

In American political theory, fiscal conservatism or economic conservatism is a political and economic philosophy regarding fiscal policy and fiscal responsibility with an ideological basis in capitalism, individualism, limited government, and laissez-faire economics. Fiscal conservatives advocate tax cuts, reduced government spending, free markets, deregulation, privatization, free trade, and minimal government debt. Fiscal conservatism follows the same philosophical outlook as classical liberalism. This concept is derived from economic liberalism.

Although that’s true, such material can easily be used to groom children which is where I think the real danger lies.

I really wish they had excluded children in the datasets.

You can’t really put a stop to it anymore but I don’t think it should be something that’s normalized and accepted just because there isn’t a direct victim anymore. We are also talking about distribution here and not something being done in private at home.

He’s going to demand we unhang saddam next.

The Cambridge dictionary has this as it’s only definition since it’s other use is archaic.

to kill a large number of something, or to reduce something severely

Using the word to mean reducing by 1/10th started to fall out of use in the 1800s.

Yes exactly. Yet the islands were included but Russia wasn’t. So the situation isn’t that Russia has no trade and tariffs are useless against it, but that Russia was specifically singled out so they wouldn’t receive tariffs.

Just take the loss, jfc.

Yes, they were essentially executed. IDF soldiers knowingly shot at an ambulance clearly announcing itself as one and killed it’s occupants, and then waited for others ambulances (the convoy) to come help and shot them up to.

We first use the DE-COP membership inference attack (Duarte et al. 2024) to determine whether a particular data sample was part of a target model’s training set. This works by quizzing an LLM with a multiple choice test to see whether it can identify original human-authored O’Reilly book paragraphs from machine-generated paraphrased alternatives that we present it with. If the model frequently correctly identifies the actual (human-generated) booktext (for books published during the model’s training period) then this likely indicates priormodel recognition (training) of that text.

I’m almost certain OpenAI trained on copyrighted content but this proves nothing other then it’s ability to distinguish between human and machine written text.

Alaska does make sense because of their geographic position but Texas is definitely an outlier.

We concentrated so much on solar energy we completely forgot moon energy, and now, we must pay for that oversight.

It isn’t. I’d even say that simply completing puzzles is far from AGI, even if the puzzles are complex.

I heard certain guards overlooking certain camps said the same thing.

If someone asks me to commit genocide, it’s going to take a bit more then “pushback” to get me to do it.

I’m mostly talking about being able to train on copyrighted content. This is on me though, I got mixed up. That’s what I meant in my first comment.

If you think someone can train a model on legally obtained data (Google images, YouTube, internet archive), then that is fair.

Personally, I think using pirated or at least bought content that is ripped (Netflix, DVDs) should be exempt (for everyone obviously, not just OpenAI.) Some data is already behind huge mega corps like record labels, Hollywood, publishing houses, etc. OpenAI can afford the cost but the little guys will be screwed when it comes to SOTA.

It’s also worth noting that most current lawsuits are aimed at how the data is used and not how it’s sourced if I’m not mistaken. The laws coming from these lawsuits won’t be used to bolster anti-piracy laws but copyright laws instead, targeting fair use and transformative clauses imo.