Whoa, he got the rich to pay taxes.
Not government taxes tho.

Teens have sex, it’s the participation of elders that makes it “inappropriate” (predatory, exploitive).

A Christmas miracle!!
(Jk, it’s just a coincidence - it’s an all-year-round perk … works better when there is no evidence tho)

/s

Ok, but biggest owners are Blackrock & Vanguard megavultures (like all the everythings).

The proposal came from a racists NCPPR group, so without significant support & the board just jumped at the free PR opportunity.

The batteries go in the other hole.

In case of Steam.

With GOG I get an actual license key & terms that state my ownership.

GOG is the only big option if you want to own the games you purchase.

They can also jump over the moon, they just know not to.

Omg I can’t believe they’ll mimic the appearance of a standard graphics card!! What will they think of next?!

(I thought they at least showed the pcb)

Cows don’t drink raw cat milk.

They literally generate as much as that small fan in the case can generate.

With the aerodynamics of the case it’s just a matter of converting higher pressure into lower pressure with higher (& a bit more laminated) airflow.

Now it’s a paperweight on someones desk.

Wait, is this within unix surrealism universe?

Anyways, my trusty usb cable wired to a 9" nail in my forehead can interact and even fix most drivers.

Tumbleweed (common)

Just a weed, a rolling shrubbery, non-evil.

My grandparents (now 90+) didn’t care much when I would change their distro, they are currently on Tumbleweed (just bcs thats what I decided to run on everyones computer I’m asked to maintain).

I would keep their general experience about the same for their use case (same desktop/desktop dock shortcuts, same browser ofc).

But yeah, Fedora (def Silverblue) or wherever you are familiar with.
(Lol, I never actually tried Mint myself, but that too - like a modern Ubuntu alternative)

*of the blessed sibling

Yes, exactly.

I don’t think I said anything provocative or not common knowledge.

The CEOs responsibilities are specified by shareholders - more exactly via bylaws, general meetings, usually annual, and supervisory board supervision, usually monthly or quarterly.

Eg: If a CEO decides on their own they they will refuse to pay any cancer treatments that can get him removed. Or even if they decide to cover all cancer treatments. The latter being my point more exactly bcs that would lower profits ofc. CEOs have to justify their decisions and affects on company statements much like regular employees, but on a company level. CEOs get fired for the stupidest reasons, but in any case it’s usually easier to just pay them out so there are no legal processings (that is bad especially in publicly traded companies).

I don’t understand why would they

pass all their responsibility onto shareholders and absolve themselves of duty

Thats the whole job they got from and agreed to do (passing it back just means quitting, which they can do). “Their boss” tells them what to do.
(If you get the job to operate the ice cream machine then thats your “responsibility”, you can’t put it back on your boss unless by quitting, which means it’s nobodies responsibility until the next worker is assigned.)

This is exactly it - we are taught words work, but in reality that is just so that violence can be condemned when it happens to important people.

And no, people eventually stop working for a monarchy that goes through one king per year.

Yes, the shareholders.

Shareholders chose the supervisory board and dictate the general direction, differs a lot but at least profit goals (short and long term).

CEOs that don’t perform, or leave low hanging fruit, or won’t do what others are willing to do just get replaced.

Shareholders have all the power to give CEOs different goals - eg a number of people covered or don’t anything non-monetary.
At the very least if CEOs wouldn’t be incentivized by company profits things would be better.

randos

How was this a rando? They premeditated killing this rando?

But - a lot (most/all?) of social rights we have now were achieved exactly like that. When protesting fails, politicians don’t step in (or are defending the corporations), something at some point brakes.
You know, the guillotine story. And they invented that when corporations/wealthy families had much less wealth concentrated than today.

Then we get system changes like actual effective healthcare. The ugly historical truth is only violence gets noticed & harder to hide. And it’s not like the next CEO won’t be very aware of what happened to his predecessor.