I agree but how many people in the west call USA war tactics terrorist?

Terrorist acts, in its core, are what is meant to shock the population, a means of (usually killing the civilian population) achieving the effect on people with less (economically).
Eg nuking civilian population (for terror among the nation) vs nuking the same nations unpopulated areas (or, weeks before that, systematically using incendiary bombs on civilians).

Words have meaning, that is why propaganda changes the narratives/words (sometimes even word definitions).

She must have called that kid at the Capitol an N-word SO MANY TIMES to get that much…

Not a terrorist after a terrorist from there same faction gets into the highest pubic office.

Unfortunately/sadly I’m not even being sarcastic. That is just how it works, what next gens get taught, & what the majority just accepts over time (until the regime change).

We still celebrate plenty of historical monsters.

That son of a cat actually did it!!

Like the French do.

Yes, I member the Stratolaunch!

And the other wacky one, the flying wing, never got any of the huge concept (especially passenger) realised.

YB-35/49 was basically the biggest (50m wingspan).
Northrop_YB-49

Also very impractical:

Lol, just a smol incident.

Then again:

wiki/Boeing_747

They should just have a standard conversion module for B-52, would work for centuries.

Virgin Dork Ages Slayer: hides behind the shield

Chad Ranger: literally rocket-jumps out of enemy fire

deleted by creator

Yes, I know & agree :(.

It’s just what my brainhole does to micro-entertain itself.

Proxmox ftw

Ass action go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Autostreer to far right might sound good to some (apparently??) but it’s an issue in actual traffic.

Didn’t this guy default on most of his loans several times?

It was funded by & clearly (since day 1 of the first talks) mostly if not solely a benefit to Russia.

Never forget how ads work on everyone. It’s just how our brains are wired.