

Shocked we had the backbone to standup to the US if they did, as it looks, put pressure on to choose one of their providers.
Great to pick a UK company so the investment will stay here as much as possible.


Shocked we had the backbone to standup to the US if they did, as it looks, put pressure on to choose one of their providers.
Great to pick a UK company so the investment will stay here as much as possible.


For humans by humans
Could have fooled me


They’ve done this with a few other games. I remember the EU5 review being really choppy and it turned out they were running it on like 6-7 year old hardware. It might just be a cost cutting measure to not buy the latest stuff for all their reviewers but I basically ignore most of what they say now.


I can’t see them actually undoing it. It will just become a thing that is no longer enforced. Once one company stands up to it and refuses to pay the fine, and the uk can’t force them to pay, others will do it. Once enough do it the UK will stop trying (hopefully)


But they are making up for the lack of real visits by increasing their scrapping
Yeah same. The way I think about federation is in a kind of per “product” approach. That’s a piece of software can be run by anyone and all communicate and work as a whole is the main benefit. Cross compatibility between “products”/software is just an added bonus, but not necessary


So when’s the ruling against OpenAI and the like using the same copyrighted material to train their models
Can’t really see much good coming from yet another left wing party. To the left of labour you have the Greens, Lib Dems, Plaid (Wales), SNP (Scotland), and now this new party.
All this does is split the left vote and make it easier for Reform under FPTP. Plus once this inevitably collapses, it will just put their potential voters (mostly young people) off politics rather than vote for another party.
I hope I am wrong but I think Corbyn has really misjudged this one.