Reading it yeah… The claim is not very plausible.

CrowdStrike saying “we are safe” but then later doing a fuckup does not constitute intention to defraud.

No it isn’t for sale.

Pull your smelly dick out of the public discourse, America

Grok was still able to produce sexually explicit images, and that restrictions, such as paywalling certain features, may not fully block access […]

Charging money for revenge porn didn’t work as a “restriction”? Demanding people paying to access CSAM didn’t “fully block” it?

Whoever at Reuters allowed that sentence to form is just cooked.

I can totally believe that nobody else felt like bribing paying out of their nose to have a Guinness employee fly over and look at a small computer and go “yep its small”.

There is something beautiful about banning xenophobes and anti-immigrants from entering your country.

Like, it’s literally what they are pushing for.

It is illegal, but their angle is that he wasn’t internationally or nationally recognized as a legitimate leader.

Don’t be so negative! It’s also found a huge market in scams. Both for stealing celebrity likenesses, and making pictures and video of nonexistent products.

They try to do security the same way, by adding “pwease dont use dangerous shell commands” to the system prompt.

Security researchers have dubbed it “Prompt Begging”

Agree, the term is misleading.

Talking about hallucinations lets us talk about undesired output as a completely different thing than desires output, which implies it can be handled somehow.

The problem it the LLM can only ever output bullshit. Often the bullshit is decent and we call it output, and sometimes the bullshit is wrong and we call it hallucination.

But it’s the exact same thing from the LLM. You can’t make it detect it or promise not to make it.

Wow so next time I have a burning need for agentic experiences in my life I know a product exists to serve my need.