Holy fuck. Because for some fucking reason, the goddamned director of the fucking central intelligence agency doesn’t fucking know that just because you’re able doesn’t mean you should.

Never fucking mind also apparently just not fucking knowing about the JWICS that’s designed for this exact motherfucking purpose.

‘Fuck’ count: 7

(Sorry, couldn’t resist. 😋 😇 I get your anger though; agree.)

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

From the article …

On March 23rd, as Mr Imamoglu was being moved to a maximum-security prison on the city’s outskirts, the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) staged a primary election to confirm him as its candidate in the next presidential elections, scheduled for 2028. It was open to all voters, not just CHP members. The party said 15m Turks took part.

… and …

Meral, a housewife, joined the protests with her daughter, a university student. “This is not about Imamoglu or the CHP,” she says. “This is because our right to vote and to be elected is being taken away.”

Paywalled.

Feel free to block me.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Signatures in Lemmy comments are spam.

Like putting your sexual kinks in a email signature

Touch grass. Really.

Being little spam doesn’t make it cool. Being little spam about your copyleft views doesn’t make it cool.

I would argue that ignorance tends to benefit corporations moreso than regular people without power. Take avail of any power that you have available to you, before its all gone.

Also, if you don’t defend others views, then one day, your views will not be defended.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Would be nice if it could be set as some kind of post / comment metadata, hidden from view but there in the code.

I’d love that, if it would be legally respected by corporations/scrapers. I even mention my license intention for my content in my bio here on Lemmy as well. It would save me allot of hassle arguing with others as well.

Until then, I have to embed the license in the content itself, especially while the new AI law is just starting to sort out these issues.

Like putting your sexual kinks in a email signature or telling everyone who didn’t ask that you’re vegan.
(quoting another person, not the one I’m directly replying to)

But honestly people, if you are being bothered by a simple link in a comment, that is allowed on Lemmy, then you really need to look within. If your client of choice is not displaying subscripted fonts correctly, and hence the text/link looks worse than it should, then you really need to speak with the devs of the client about that (as I mentioned in my ‘FAQ’ link, I’m using official Lemmy.World formatting). And if you don’t like seeing a license in general, then I can’t help you with that one, except for maybe giving some ‘touch grass’ advice (especially to the person I quoted above).

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

BOOO stupid long copyright signatures!

Some info about that …

https://lemmy.world/post/26711096/15639879

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Potential great news, but need to see more than just the CEO saying this.

Looking forward to the Gamers Nexus (or Hardware Umboxed, etc.) review on the chip/products.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

From the article …

In a conference call, Ubisoft chief financial officer Frederick Duguet said the subsidiary’s board “will be controlled by Ubisoft, so Ubisoft will continue controlling and consolidating this entity.”

That question/point is answered in the link that I supplied above.

There also a comment from a mod in there that you should read.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Amongst other things, yes.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Activision User Research Union-CWA is the first group of video game user researchers to form a union

So what exactly about their users do they research?

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Ahh, ok. Thanks. Was focusing on the body/paragraph of the text.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=2015+study+of+low-skilled+Halo+players+males+to+females

🌏👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

I get the meme, but I don’t know how to apply it to this post.

Could someone elaborate?

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Some info about that …

https://lemmy.world/post/26711096/15639879

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

Man, this current age of AI really sucks.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

From the article …

GNOME sysadmin Bart Piotrowski shared on Mastodon that only about 3.2 percent of requests (2,690 out of 84,056) passed their challenge system, suggesting the vast majority of traffic was automated.

I notice you asked for an explanation and then only sort-of read the first sentence.

No, I read the whole thing, fully. I just disagreed with your analogy, thought it was a bad one, too verbose and obfuscating of the subject being talked about. Also it didn’t cover someone searching your belongings with/without your permission, the subject being talked about. Law officials have more legal leeway to detain you than they do to search your belongings without your permission, so your analogy doesn’t work (especially when you throw in beatings into it).

Also, didn’t think your last paragraph was legally accurate, but didn’t want to bother arguing the point, since ‘amendment > law > policy/rule’ is a well-known given. I’m aware of the difference. When I asked my original question, it was to confirm if the border enforcement people were actually honoring the 4th amendment, or not, whatever their thought processes were.

I did appreciate you taking the time to reply (and civilly at that) though, thank you. P.S. I hope the tone of my reply wasn’t too harsh, it wasn’t meant to be rude, just straightforward.

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}

“May I have your permission to search through your phone?”

“Yes.”

_{This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0}