One state for both?

Technically 2 states (it’s literally called “2 states 1 homeland”) but with “freedom of movement” across them. Either way, wishful thinking.

The vision is only explained near the bottom, obviously:

Coming from very different positions, the two women are co-executive directors of A Land for All, which since 2012 has promoted “two sovereign states — Israel and Palestine — in one shared homeland.”

Rather than divide Palestine into two wholly separate countries, A Land for All calls for shared responsibility for resources like water systems, electricity and public health. But two independent states would exist, with “recognized borders, right for self-determination, equal rights, and security for both peoples.”

People would be free to travel across both states and to live in either one; Israelis could live in Palestine, and Palestinians in Israel. Jerusalem would be the capital of both states, and freely accessible to both peoples. Their justice systems would “include recognition and compensation for past wrongs — without creating new ones.”

That sounds very naïve – there are too many religious extremists on either side.

I would get about 20x to 50x more up traffic with a forwarded port and no IPv6, as opposed to no forwarded port and IPv6.

I don’t like YoY share percentage point delta. It’s misleading and making it seem like a significant number of Mac users left, although they probably just stagnated while more Windows and Linux users came. I’d rarher see YoY absolute number delta.

This just became so ironic…