He has a pattern of making statements like these as test balloons, to gauge public sentiment. Sometimes he’ll back off if the backlash is big enough, thinking it makes him look magnanimous or something to not commit atrocities after all.
Coldside was just emplifying your joke
Honestly, does Canada have any incentive to respect DMCA requests at this point?
I assume they’ll have to edit for length regardless - so I imagine they’re planning to make the unedited clip available online, like they’ve done with their other extended interviews. Lot less restrictions on what can air that way, too.
It’s not the decomposition, it’s the bladder and bowels slowly emptying themselves!
On the other hand, if body odor bothers you…
Sure - time they spend there is time not spent on something more incriminating!
Print at a public library?
Quietly swapping your earlier edition with the current edition was not, however.
Not all of them. Many were suppressed votes.
Carbon footprint - AI burns a lot more power than old fashioned search results.
I get wanting to cost them more, but I don’t think they’ll see this use case as a cost.
I’m choosing to read that as someone is screwing with him.
Because the US could do a whole lot more?
It’s a popular look!
My point is that he was more than just a cog. He may not have been the sole villain and mastermind, but he was more than just a cog - he was a driver.
He could have done a number of other things. He wasn’t just a cog, he actively drove many of the problems with the health insurance industry today, as the person in control of the most egregious offender.
I’m sure he’ll be replaced with someone similar, and I’m sure he had plenty of encouragement; but that doesn’t make him any less culpable.
It kinda sounds like he did this with at least the bones of a plan. And aren’t silencers relatively easy to improvise, if you don’t need it to last?
Died, disabled, or went through other unnecessary, avoidable pain and suffering. It’s… quite a pool of candidates.
It sounds like he was receiving regular death threats and considered it par for the course.
If the CEO disagrees with the directions of the board, the CEO has a number of options. They can easily be considered culpable.
Would he notice at this point?