Frederik: The Kalmar Union is dead, long live Greenland!
Kalaallit Nunaat: Isn’t it a bit late for colonial wars? Can West-Britain and Southern Norway argue this out somewhere else?
US President Elect: What’s final price? Can you do better than that?
True, but climate in Central Europe is different to the US-Canada border.
at your rate we’re gonna have a free tech stack before we have equality. The struggle against patriarchy is not a joke
Why is he saying this now?
With a bluetooth modem lol
No, you are right. I want Europe to have a resilient grid. I assume Germany would even pay for most of the costs of the transmission infrastructure, given that they consume a lot. I think in a mixture of storage and grid expansion, optimising for grid stability is important. Sweden might want to have a plan for dark, dry, coldrums as well.
What if Sweden built transmission between its north and south? Then it wouldn’t have to point fingers against a party the Swedish ruling party doesn’t like.
Edit: Yeah, there might be truth to the pricing scheme, but pointing at nuclear power phaseout is not ok.
I’m a supporter of more scrutiny in general when it comes to kids having access to stuff online, (A lot of stuff, not just 18+ things). but that’s obviously the avenue that the Morality Police are trying to take to go after society in general
The smokescreen of supposed enforcement of children’s rights is so thick, that the issue they say they try to address cannot be discussed even among the adult electorate.
Children cannot comprehend pornography, but so are the proponents of sexual control. Our current societies do not have adequate education of sexuality, even or especially for adults.
A theoretical child in a theoretical society, that has no concept of sexuality, a “pure” child so to speak, will be unfit as an adult for a sexually-controlled society, because it will very likely be unable to say no to coercion. Children and adults cannot resist coercive societies without education.
Pornography is a market with low elasticity. States banning markets essentially lose significant control over the exchanges. States already ban coercive pornography (not very good, but idealistically), but allow consensual pornography. Banning pornography altogether mingles coercive pornography with consensual pornography in black markets. Uneducated adults will not understand coercion in black markets of pornography.
Yeah, that might be a side effect.
While Pornhub pulling out of Florida (US) may not be the end of the !world@lemmy.world, the underlying trend of pornography criminalisation for “modesty” can easily translated into sexual control and control of sex.
As we all know by now, sexual control is gendered against women and queers, racialised, et al.
Control of sex on the other hand is well substrated in Anti-Choice or bodily autonomy-denying discourse as well as population control for classist, racist etc. motives.
Since when is Florida scared of sex? Since it hates minorities. (IMO)
I feel like this knowledge is gonna spread for the wrong reasons.
Isn’t that somewhat the polar opposite to what Australia did?
Lower Saxony.
I expected a joke about a monarch
This is very little about contemporary money.