• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “None of the photos of him dead look dead” isn’t a great choice as your very first point if you’re trying to make a compelling argument.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        O…kay, you got any sources with even a shred of credibility? Because those are links to two random entertainers on youtube, a substack article (yay, nazi news platforms!) and an article that claims to have accessed epstein’s FedEx account but doesn’t provide even a screenshot as evidence.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          While his sources lack credibility, dismissing every substack as a “nazi news platform” is disingenuous

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No, not really. Substack is a blog hosting platform that pays it’s subscribers - including straight up nazis. While there may be individual substack blogs with journalistic value (although I have never personally seen one) the platform itself is a problem, and much as with twitter, it is perfectly reasonable for me to be skeptical of the people that choose to remain on it.

        • redsand@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m not chatGPT, I’m not going to do your work for you for free. Those videos show you URLs in the files or… Who am I kidding, you aren’t going to do leg work, you’re so incredibly intellectually lazy as to write off all of substack and YouTube. GL skid

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The only links in the descriptions for those videos are for Dr. G’s course, which isn’t a good look

            • redsand@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah lazy YouTube descriptions suck but the note in his cell is way too much work to parse and he did a good job. Especially with some of that handwriting. Very much worth watching if you’re good at deciphering bad handwriting.

              Guard transcripts don’t need the video you can read those.