• Brosplosion@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It literally is? They are expanding power over a foreign nation via military means. That’s basically the definition of imperialism.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It was an inter-imperialist war except on the eastern front, where it was a war to destroy communism. The capitalist Allies and the USSR were an alliance of convenience, which is why the West made the USSR its enemy the moment the war ended.

    • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re talking about simple conquest. By that definition any offensive side in a war is imperialist, which is nonsensical as that means nearly every war in human history involved at least one “imperialist” power.

      Imperialism is system of establishing and maintaining hegemony over large areas for the benefit of an elite (capital in modern times, patricians in ancient times, etc) within a metropole (probably too simple of a definition but it works). The Romans were an empire not just because they had an emperor and not because they conquered lands, but because they controlled lands from Spain to Syria and wealth flowed from those lands into Rome.