The specialist in neurodevelopmental issues argues the case for banning social media for under-16s: ‘Those who had a smartphone with free access to internet content before the age of 15 have worse mental health indicators’
  • bearboiblake@pawb.socialEnglish
    23·
    11 hours ago

    You do not improve a person’s life by removing that person’s freedom, is my point. There aren’t any teenage billionaires…?

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      1·
      9 hours ago

      My point is you vastly improve others’ lives. You reduce the ceiling of freedom for everyone but increase the baseline freedom everyone experiences

      • bearboiblake@pawb.socialEnglish
        1·
        8 hours ago

        How is this even slightly relevant to the topic? Whose life are you improving by taking away the freedom of young people?