Summary
Police say King Charles’s brother is in custody and officers are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk - read the police statement in full

  • Hyaline_Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Funny how I knew it wasn’t in America not because of the name, but because someone in public office went into custody.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      He’s being arrested for sharing official documents. Not the disgusting crimes he committed against children and/or women. It’s not real accountability, it’s theater meant to placate the angry masses.

      • crapwittyname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I read some analysis on this in the guardian, it predicted this would happen, because the police have limited resources and can only follow up one of the two charges. This charge is chosen because there is far more likely to be incontrovertible evidence, probably in the form of paper trails etc. Whereas proving he raped children decades ago relies on witness testimony, which is far easier for his very expensive (taxpayer-funded, mind) lawyers to talk down in court.
        If this cunt sees a single day in prison I call that a win.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Go check out the fawning coverage of The Royals by The Guardian over the years.

          It surprises me not at all that “on such an unfortunate occasion” The Guardian would be busy spinning a “reasonable” rationally for not taking to court a member of the Royal Family for those crimes which would result in a lot of dirty linen being washed in public.

          “The policy have limited resources, nothing we can do about it, best let it go”

          (Curiously, the police have the resources to, for example, go after people against the Genocide in Gaza as Terrorist Supporters or Demonstrators for “Disturbing Public Order”)

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        theater meant to placate the angry masses

        Thousands of years into our civilization and the oldest tricks still work the best. The more things change and all that.

        edit: that said, Epstein was almost definitely working as a double-agent between various organizations, maybe a quadruple agent or more, he wasn’t so well-connected and powerful just because he dealt children, he also dealt secrets between superpowers, so just having contact with him as a state official puts a massive spotlight on you as a security risk.

        National governments care a lot more about you being a security risk than they do about you hurting kids.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The penalty is mostly fines. Even sharing military secrets in UK is only 2 years. WTF Brits.

        • duncan_bayne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          OTOH - consider the plight of Manning and Snowden. Perhaps a penalty of 2 years would encourage whistleblowers?

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Many Democrats have been arrested. The fascist political persecution is already in full swing.