• deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I think it’s not about primitivism, but discarding tools that atrophy us rather than empower us.

    I’m not sure what side humanoid robots fall on.

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Robots are always on the side of their masters.

      Kung fu robots don’t work for usa, so they’re on my side.

      Boston dynamics dog robots work for usa, so they’re not on my side.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      but discarding tools that atrophy us rather than empower us.

      In the book it discarded tools that empowered us and ending up atrophying humanity basically forever, and even when the atrophy supposedly ended for the price of unbelivable suffering, it was only vulgar numerical and territorial growth, not empowerment. And it STILL required usage of not only forbidden tech but also technomagic required to even have a primitivist interstellar civilization.

      Butlerian jihad was deeply reactionary war and every leftist should fight against the bastards that set up the Great Convention system.