If North American vehicles are considered too gigantic and heavy to safely share the road with reasonably sized European ones, the correct solution isn’t to forgo European-approved cars
Very simple concept. If 2+2=4 in China and in the West, then if a thing done in the West is “good” then the same thing being done in China must also be “good”. The action, not the actor, should determine if a thing is “good” or “bad”. Almost all news sources define “good” and “bad” subjectively (i.e. based on the actor) not objectively (i.e. based on the action and the result).
When the west does it it’s called freedom but when China foes it it’d called artificial tyranny.
So is it okay because the West does it too or wdym
Very simple concept. If 2+2=4 in China and in the West, then if a thing done in the West is “good” then the same thing being done in China must also be “good”. The action, not the actor, should determine if a thing is “good” or “bad”. Almost all news sources define “good” and “bad” subjectively (i.e. based on the actor) not objectively (i.e. based on the action and the result).
So are both of those things good or bad in your opinion?
It doesn’t matter what my opinion is I’m arguing for consistency.
But you don’t know if the person you replied to is being inconsistent