If you are to believe the glossy marketing campaigns about ‘quantum computing’, then we are on the cusp of a computing revolution, yet back in the real world things look a lot less dire. At least if you’re worried about quantum computers (QCs) breaking every single conventional encryption algorithm in use today, because at this point they cannot even factor 21 yet without cheating.

In the article by [Craig Gidney] the basic problem is explained, which comes down to simple exponentials. Specifically the number of quantum gates required to perform factoring increases exponentially, allowing QCs to factor 15 in 2001 with a total of 21 two-qubit entangling gates. Extrapolating from the used circuit, factoring 21 would require 2,405 gates, or 115 times more.

underlying article: https://algassert.com/post/2500

    • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      We hypothesise that the production of fully entangled sheep is easy, given how hard it can be to disentangle their coats in the first place. The logistics of assembling the tens of thousands of sheep necessary to factorise RSA-2048 numbers is left as an open problem

      Omg, I simply cannot! Thanks for brightening my day with this paper XD

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      a well trained dog outperforms current quantum-made calculations 👍🥳

    • MetalSlugX@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seriously recommend this. I saw it a while back and found it highly informative.

      The talk is on YT… Id link but at work atm