• CXORA@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Nah. The core issue is believing things without strong evidence. Whenever you do that you open yourself up for manipulation. The core requirement of “beleif” is what causes the harms of “religion” as youre choosing to divide the terms.

    • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, you’re right that believing bullshit without a good reason can be a problem. A big problem. For example, anti-vaxers. But even there, individual anti-vaxers aren’t much of a problem (except to themselves and maybe their kids). It’s only when they start organizing and occupying power positions where they can change laws and endanger everyone else that they become an actual issue.

      Then again, many people believe many things without evidence, but a lot of it doesn’t really harm anyone else. Believing something in itself isn’t necessarily an issue.

      I could believe that an invisible purple elephant controls the people around me, and it wouldn’t hurt anyone else. They’d laugh at me when I told them, but that’s about the end of it. People can believe whatever bullshit they want for themselves. As long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else, do/think/believe whatever the fuck you want. When you believe in some wizard on a cloud who controls and judges your life, that’s your problem. But when you find millions of others who believe the same crap and then you organize and try to force your beliefs on others, that’s the problem.

      Belief =/= religion.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Nah, when you believe things without good evidence the rot sets in. Religion and belief in the supernatural in general are always harmful to society.

        • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          You know I’m not even really arguing against what you said, right? It’s a matter of degree.

          I’d rather be surrounded by 10 million people who all have their own personal beliefs (however problematic that might be in your eyes), than by 10 million members of one big religion that has the will and power to try and force me to live by their rules.

            • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Well, excusez-moi, I didn’t know imaginary utopias were part of this discussion. At least in that we are 100% agreed, that’s what I would want too.

              Although technically, 10 million people with individual beliefs is exactly what you describe. It’s not a religion until it’s organized. :p

              • CXORA@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I disagree. The phrase “organized religion” exists for a reason. Most people do not seem to use the word religion the way you do.