This is what undoing decade worth of progression in less than a year looks like. With such progressive movements, people who oppose it go into social hiding and come out when the time is right. If the progression hasn’t lasted enough to become a societal reflex then it can be toppled easily. That is what we are seeing with things like LGBQT+ rights, DEI, inclusivity etc in the US
I think you meant pedophiles, since its an attraction. Sex offenders are people who already offended; therefore, touched kids.
I can agree with the last part, there is no excuse he can make to change the situation for him or others. Also he might be a nepophile, which really highlights the vile part.
I don’t think you know the definition of sex offender, it doesn’t always mean someone’s done something to kids. You can be a sex offender and only attacked adults. Hell, you can be a sex offender without even touching another person. So “sex offender” isn’t enough here. A “pedophile sex offender works”, but even then it doesn’t show that he has done the worst sex crime that can make you a sex offender, so I’d say it’s still not enough. A “child rapist” is really the best way to ensure everyone knows exactly what he’s done.
Everyone who would have posted something racist and vile like this just 2 years ago would have been expelled from school or college or lost their job.
This is absolutely insane.
Also this guy is a pedofile and rapist without any morals.
This is what undoing decade worth of progression in less than a year looks like. With such progressive movements, people who oppose it go into social hiding and come out when the time is right. If the progression hasn’t lasted enough to become a societal reflex then it can be toppled easily. That is what we are seeing with things like LGBQT+ rights, DEI, inclusivity etc in the US
So essentially a sex offender, lets not forget there is a word specifically for this purpose.
There are sex offenders who don’t touch kids, he’s of the extra vile type.
I think you meant pedophiles, since its an attraction. Sex offenders are people who already offended; therefore, touched kids.
I can agree with the last part, there is no excuse he can make to change the situation for him or others. Also he might be a nepophile, which really highlights the vile part.
I don’t think you know the definition of sex offender, it doesn’t always mean someone’s done something to kids. You can be a sex offender and only attacked adults. Hell, you can be a sex offender without even touching another person. So “sex offender” isn’t enough here. A “pedophile sex offender works”, but even then it doesn’t show that he has done the worst sex crime that can make you a sex offender, so I’d say it’s still not enough. A “child rapist” is really the best way to ensure everyone knows exactly what he’s done.