This is what Polymarket posted

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Mamdani proposed the city-owned stores not have to pay rent or overhead taxes, leading to lower consumer prices. They would buy and sell groceries at wholesale prices, centralize warehousing and distribution, and partner with local neighborhoods to source products.

    Thats a great idea actually

    • enterpries@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      City-owned, does this mean all ‘profit’ goes back into the city and the business is not operated in a way to maximize profit?

    • JPAKx4@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Grocery stores don’t have a lot of margins, so this move won’t reduce prices by much or at all. What it will do is improve low income areas the “market” has left alone to improve the availability and quality of nearby food. I’ve heard a lot of people skeptical of the “lower prices” part, when I think the food desert part is a much more important part of the plan tbh.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They have low margins because they have high costs (like rent, logistics and insurance stuff), so if those get reduced then they can lower prices by exactly that amount while keeping the same margin.