Pro@reddthat.com to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoFirst they came for steam, then they came for itch.io .reddthat.comimagemessage-square201linkfedilinkarrow-up1601arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1596arrow-down1imageFirst they came for steam, then they came for itch.io .reddthat.comPro@reddthat.com to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square201linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarePetter1@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI guess you interpreted my comment wrong… What I say is that basically any alternative crypto coin is way more efficient than bitcoin and thus it would be dumb to go for bitcoin compared to the trillion other crypto coins. ✌🏻
minus-square9bananas@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoah, that makes more sense! just as an aside, for future reference: you wrote, Bitcoin, and the millions other way more efficient alternatives 😜" when you really meant to write: Bitcoin, or the millions other way more efficient alternatives 😜" it may be s subtle difference, but when you write “and” it means bitcoin AND the other alternatives are efficient. when you use “or” instead, it means bitcoin OR the more efficient alternatives. so my interpretation was correct. you just didn’t write what you thought you did…
minus-squarePetter1@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoOhh, yea, guess that are symptoms of my native language being swiss german 😆 we use sometimes strange word-combinations for comparison of stuff Thank you for the head up!
minus-square9bananas@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agohey, no worries! just felt like it might be useful to know where the misunderstanding happened i’m glad if it helped, cheers!
I guess you interpreted my comment wrong…
What I say is that basically any alternative crypto coin is way more efficient than bitcoin and thus it would be dumb to go for bitcoin compared to the trillion other crypto coins.
✌🏻
ah, that makes more sense!
just as an aside, for future reference:
you wrote,
when you really meant to write:
it may be s subtle difference, but when you write “and” it means bitcoin AND the other alternatives are efficient.
when you use “or” instead, it means bitcoin OR the more efficient alternatives.
so my interpretation was correct. you just didn’t write what you thought you did…
Ohh, yea, guess that are symptoms of my native language being swiss german 😆 we use sometimes strange word-combinations for comparison of stuff
Thank you for the head up!
hey, no worries!
just felt like it might be useful to know where the misunderstanding happened
i’m glad if it helped, cheers!