• Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    What do you expect him to do, as in, what does a “firm stance” look like to you?

    • healthetank@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not suspended the DST pending an agreement, but rescinded fully

      Its not hard to say “were willing to play ball, provided this leads to an agreement”.

      I’m not opposed to dropping the DST, I’m opposed to dropping it rather than suspending it so trump will come talk at the table.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Trump says “No further negotiations if the DST goes through”

        I am asking you specifically, what does a firm stance look like to you in that situation?

        What are the consequences of that stance?

        • healthetank@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I don’t know how to be clearer for you.

          A hard stance looks like this:

          "Canada values its strong partnership with the United States and acknowledges the concerns raised over our proposed DST. In a show of good faith and commitment to reaching a balanced trade agreement, we are suspending the DST indefinitely.

          However, if a mutually acceptable agreement cannot be reached, Canada reserves the right to implement the measure as planned. Our goal remains a fair and forward-looking solution that supports a level playing field for all."

          Thus we reached trumps goal - DST doesn’t move forward or go through. It stays exactly where it is, but its not a concession for nothing, and makes it clear that the DST remains part of the negotiations.

          • Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            What information do you have that says we won’t institute the DST in the future if no deal is reached?

            • healthetank@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              What proof you have he will? He has given no indication of it, and it is currently canceled.

              • Arkouda@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                He has given no indication of it, and it is currently canceled.

                “To support those negotiations, the Minister of Finance and National Revenue, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, announced today that Canada would rescind the Digital Services Tax (DST) in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States.

                https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2025/06/canada-rescinds-digital-services-tax-to-advance-broader-trade-negotiations-with-the-united-states.html

                Seems that the rescinding of this legislation is tied to a “mutually beneficial and comprehensive trade arrangement” demonstrating that the DST is not currently completely off the table. In fact, the legislation to rescind it hasn’t been tabled yet.

                “The June 30, 2025 collection will be halted, and Minister Champagne will soon bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act.”

                What information do you have that says we won’t institute the DST in the future if no deal is reached?