T (they/she)@beehaw.org to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoA word about systemdskarnet.orgexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkA word about systemdskarnet.orgT (they/she)@beehaw.org to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareleisesprecher@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoI mean, what is his point? We should have worse software because then the devs are volunteers? Is Linux now supposed to work like early Olympics?
minus-squareFindmysec@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoExplain how other init systems are necessarily worse than systemd
minus-squareCrypticCoffee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-24 months agoSystemD is not an init system. It provides that functionality, but processes have more life cycle steps than just initialize. When you accept that, you realise that you cannot compare them. SystemD provides functionality that they don’t. Of course those that refuse to consider this will just claim it’s bloat. To some DE’s are bloat.
I mean, what is his point? We should have worse software because then the devs are volunteers?
Is Linux now supposed to work like early Olympics?
Explain how other init systems are necessarily worse than systemd
SystemD is not an init system. It provides that functionality, but processes have more life cycle steps than just initialize.
When you accept that, you realise that you cannot compare them.
SystemD provides functionality that they don’t. Of course those that refuse to consider this will just claim it’s bloat. To some DE’s are bloat.