• BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Look the only critique I can leverage at new Vegas is that there isn’t a communist or anarchist ending where the courier unites the disparate communities and makes something that lasts until after the courier dies. I want to be the Stalin of the wasteland.

    Edit: After getting the Lee Kuan Yew speeches on my Instagram reels I also realise Houses “give me 20 years” speech is taken from there. The people behind the game were very politically aware.
    Also apparently fallout 1, 2 and new Vegas are based on a tabletop game the designers played? Arcade Gannon was Josh Sawyer’s character

      • BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Having seen a documentary about the production the designers wanted the game to be about “letting go of Old World Blues”. All the factions cling to the past, to systems that led them to where they are today. I take it they were a bit better than regular US radlibs, which is why there isn’t any left-bashing, but they probably see communism as part of that old world blues too. It would also go against their goal if there was an obvious “good” ending.

        That said it would have done wonders for the political awakening of a bunch of people if there was one. Or, at least, if it was made clear the courier was likewise constrained by their environment, so the reason a post-post-apocalyptic spartacist movement isn’t possible is because the courier and like individuals can’t think like that. The red scare has long tendrils.
        Or at least a yes-man ending that wasn’t going all “great man” theory about the courier, where everything revolves around them and their presence.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yep, the writers are progressives, but not commies. If they had written an explicitly communist path, it likely would have been a “good in theory, bad in practice” type commonly seen in western writing.