In the recording, the mother of two can be heard discussing with her staff the success of a TPUSA event and the strong sales of associated merchandise. She then appeared to dismiss her husband’s death during the discussion while emphasizing harmony between staff.
If you really think about what I wrote, you’d see the mirror image is actually what I was pointing out. It seems kind of sexist to assume honorable intentions because she is a woman and mother.
I noticed you immediately implied I was mysoganist, though. There was not benefit of the doubt there, was there?
You also flat out accused me of stating women were worse than men, when all I called out was the framing that women are better than men.
I suppose this is where I should label you a mysandrist, but I know nothing about you and I would be attacking your character for disagreeing with me, wouldn’t I? I call out that hypocrisy in others so it would be rich of me to practice it, wouldn’t it?
My comment was a response to the implicit bias that since she is a woman, there must be some other reason than any unaltruistic impulses. Like, for example, a man who is no longer here to defend himself is the cause of the behavior due to abuse. See? It’s his fault.
Would the same statement be applied to a man? Based on what I’ve seen, he’d have received no such “benefit of the doubt”, and fatherhood would not enter the discussion because “men aren’t nurturing” (which is bullshit).