Imaging if this technology could cool a data centre.

Edit: I was not involved in this project. You are wasting your time asking me questions.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t think shape change materials are all that efficient. The problem being is you still need some mechanism to compress the material again, which obviously uses energy. As you say their main advantage is that they don’t use traditional refrigerants. But the trade-off for that is that they are mechanically more complicated and probably for any given amount of cooling will require more electricity.

    You can trade those off with renewable energy sources of course so it may still be worth it but technically they are worse efficiency than traditional vacuum pumps.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Some sources claim much higher efficiency. This makes sense to me since you are not limited by your coolant’s properties so much and don’t have to maintain pressure. But I can’t do in depth research for you.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What sources?

        The article doesn’t list any. All it says is they reached a cooling temperature of -12°C, but has no information on the energy used to achieve that.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Google “elastocaloric heat pump efficiency” thats the technical term.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’m asking what saurce you have that says that they are more efficient than refrigeration systems because everything I find says the opposite.