• AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    You are right, but their is no future for it. Combustibles need to be eliminated from our energy markets. They are harming us and the entire planet we need to live. Huge expense for small time gains is bad leadership. If the markets were nationalized, I would be more excited to get more to market, even with what I said. It is not. We don’t need to help foreign entities take our resources faster for a pittance in tax benefits. Fuck that noise.

    • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If a cold country is asking for our gas, especially to eliminate dependence on a hostile foreign regime, that is definitely a worldwide improvement and harm reduction for millions of people. Its wishful thinking to say ‘eliminate it’ but thats not going to happen overnight, if ever, in some countries. If we have the resource NOW and they need it NOW, then its in their best interest AND ours to sell it to them now.

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Did you miss the part where I said we don’t get enough return for it to build infrastructure for it. We already bought a pipeline for $4B dollars that we didn’t want. They need it now, we need it tomorrow.

        • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Who is the “we” that didn’t want the Trans Mountain pipeline? Would that be the Gov of Canada that gets about 1.25 billion in revenue this year from the pipeline? Would that be the 15,000 well paid employees that built and run the pipeline? Would that be the AB and BC gov’s who gain a lot of income tax from those employees? Would that be the people in China, South Korea, Japan, and India who buy most of that oil so they don’t have to burn coal to power their industries and don’t have to rely on shady countries like Russia? Or is it Quebecers who benefit from 14 BILLION a year in transfer payments, the vast majority of which comes from Alberta’s oil revenues? Which “we” are we referring to?

          • AlexLost@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            The government, who had to bail out a private investor who got halfway done and walked. Why did they walk? Probably due to the protesting and fighting they had to do to get that pipeline in the ground? But yeah, it was sooo wanted. Yeah, we make money. How much would we be making if it was all ours? I betcha it would be a lot more, hey? That’s where my real argument was centered. We get a pittance of the actual value of the resource because we sell off our resources instead of taking them to market.