• Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Didn’t say that was a reason to gulp it down. Just that the use cases aren’t zero.

    Knew a quadriplegic that gamed with her mouth on windows. A really well working, integrated “ai” would’ve dramatically improved her life and saved her hundreds of thousands for all the equipment and tech-guys. And yes, that’s a very limited use case, but would allow poorer disabled people to also use a computer better.

    But that’s really all good reasons I can come up with. For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      For all else noone needs the shit baked into the OS.

      So you can’t think of a single reason why anyone that’s not disabled would want to use AI on a computer? No reason anyone would want to use ChatGPT? Generate an image? Re-write some text? Summarise some text or a video? None at all? Really?

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I said baked into the OS. Noone needs that. Everyone who needs ai can open a browser. That was the whole topic here, not usefulness of ai in general 😊

          • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Name one really good application for baked-in? Nothing useful comes to my mind. And i’m not categorically against AI.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Being baked into the OS means it can access parts of the OS. Asking ChatGPT in firefox to turn off HDR on your PC doesn’t work. Using Copilot built in to the OS means it can.

              • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I know what it means, but toggling HDR isn’t really the thing that makes the total surveillance worth it. Not even for people who are ignorant to privacy.

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Oh so you do know the difference but you pretended you didn’t to try and act like there isn’t any?

                  What “total surveillance” are you talking about? You have full control over your data with copilot.