I agree that it’s editorialized compared to the very neutral way the survey puts it. That said, I think you also have to take into account how AI has been marketed by the industry.

They have been claiming AGI is right around the corner pretty much since chatGPT first came to market. It’s often implied (e.g. you’ll be able to replace workers with this) or they are more vague on timeline (e.g. OpenAI saying they believe their research will eventually lead to AGI).

With that context I think it’s fair to editorialize to this being a dead-end, because even with billions of dollars being poured into this, they won’t be able to deliver AGI on the timeline they are promising.

State capitalism, but yes.

I think that should be expected given the governing structure of almost all large companies, because they’re dictatorships. Employees have no say over who’s in leadership, and can be fired more or less without recourse. You wouldn’t expect a town hall in Russia or North Korea to allow dissent, would you?

Divide et impera

I think many countries won’t though, out of fear of retaliation from the aforementioned orange hitler. That’s a stupid reason for the EU/UK not to take advantage though, because he’s already made clear he will antagonize US allies whenever he pleases and invent an excuse to do it.

Which may be the end goal, use this as a wedge to convince their base that revoking citizenship may be justified in some cases.

IMO this should be the case for everything developed using public money, looking at you, pharmaceutical companies…