It’s not “WWF is benefitting from…”, it’s “WWF helping facilitate trade in polar bear fur, investigation reveals”. “Investigation” here refers to the article published in guardian. The proof is the lobbying WWF did. They’re complicit in allowing this, sadly. Other NGOs stood strongly against WWF: https://ssn.org/app/uploads/2019/03/Cop16_PolarBear_EN.pdf
That’d only create a black market and illegal hunting. No one needs a polar bear fur rug / coat.
https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/polar_bear_position_cites_cop_15_final.pdf?
There are links all over the article
WWF said in a 2013 statement: “If, at some stage in the future, polar bear populations become so diminished by climate change and habitat loss, and/or if international trade presents a greater threat, we would want to revisit the Cites listing issue. But we’re not at that point.”
Yeah lets wait until it’s too late for the species
Did you miss when its founder sided with Republicans (the current ones, mind you) or are you ok with it?
Credit where it’s due, switch is pretty durable except joy-cons, and they are pretty easy to repair yourself
Apple is busy fighting DMA in EU and Google is busy fighting the monopoly case in US. What are they supposed to do, fight human rights abuses instead of protecting profits of shareholders?!
I believe she wasn’t lying when she said she forgot about the gun, she seems that stupid to me
I haven’t played any game I bought last autumn sale ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Ooooh but this makes some sense though, it just becomes a post apocalyptic world then